On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 01:58:42PM +0100, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Software maintenance is a commercial support activity that is normally
> done for profit, so the PSF needs to be careful in how it approaches
> it to avoid getting in trouble with the IRS (public interest charities
> like the PSF opera
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 07:45:05AM -0500, Eric V. Smith wrote:
> Channeling Nick, I'd say that LTS support should come from commercial third
> parties, such as OS vendors. I agree with Antoine: it's not something we
> want to impose on the core devs. How much fun is 2.7 maintenance?
Are there any
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 05:30:14PM -0500, Donald Stufft wrote:
> I can do this.
Thanks!
Donald Stufft and Tim Golden have been added as moderators for the list.
--amk
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.o
I'm going on vacation starting this Tuesday November 15th, and won't
have much Internet access, and perhaps none at all, until I get back
on November 30th. Could someone please take over moderating the
Distutils-SIG mailing list? There's enough moderated traffic (list
messages, spam, misdirected
Someone ran an experiment looking at the SSH keys used on GitHub
(public keys are accessible through the API):
https://blog.benjojo.co.uk/post/auditing-github-users-keys
Excerpt:
I remembered back to the May 2008 Debian OpenSSH bug, where
the randomness source was compromised to
I'm working on a DC-area python-dev meetup. One location has been
reported to intermittently have trouble connecting to the SSH port
(port 22) externally, which would clearly make it impossible to commit
to hg.python.org.
Does hg.python.org support SSH on any alternative ports, like ?
Otherwi
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 02:37:22PM -0800, Eli Bendersky wrote:
> Just to be clear, this is exactly what I mean. I'm not saying AC is not
> worth it; I'm questioning the timing.
Agreed; let's try to avoid far-ranging sets of changes so late in the
beta cycle.
If we want to send 3.4 back to alpha a
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:01:02PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I have a T-shirt that says "English doesn't borrow from other
> languages. English follows other languages down dark alleys, knocks
> them down and goes through their pockets for loose grammar." (it's a
> paraphrase of an older quote,
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 03:25:05PM +0200, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> 'python' is a standard c-mode indentation style, however it's set up to use
> tabs. It should be updated, maybe to a 'python3' style? Here's a quick and
> dirty hack:
Thanks! I've carried out a re-indentation and whitespace cleanup
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 06:56:27PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> There was one file that I didn't touch: Modules/_cursesmodule.c
> Indentation is so uncommon there that interested people should reformat
> it themselves, if desired.
I'm happy to see the curses module re-indented. Does anyone have
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 08:03:43AM -0500, Eric Smith wrote:
> Jack Diederich wrote:
> But that's manually maintained, right? I was hoping to get something
> generated from the svn configuration.
The SVN configuration comes from a set of SSH keys checked in to a
different SVN repository. This se
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 04:36:42AM +0100, Jesus Cea wrote:
> I can't wait for HG. I have read the main cutprit for the delay is the
> line-ending issue with MS Windows developers. Is there anything else
> holding us back?.
Note that, if you'd just like to use Mercurial for your own
convenience whi
I've been analyzing how much of the Python code is covered
by the contributor agreements in the PSF's possession.
The logs show four mysterious IDs of the form uid; I'd like to
figure out who two of those IDs were. (Two of the IDs are gone in
3.1-trunk, so I don't care about them.)
uid26747
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 02:34:38PM -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 at 02:13, Anthony Baxter wrote:
> Using svnmerge to commit to three branches in addition to trunk
> is...painful. Because of the (lack of) speed.
Should we push the Mercurial transition higher on the priority li
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:07:19PM -0600, s...@pobox.com wrote:
> I do notice that there is no Apple hardware or Mac OS X running on
> anything. Any chance of adding a XServe or something?
Didn't Apple already give the PSF an XServe that's now at XS4ALL, but
currently unused?
--amk
_
I received an e-mail from Alex Handy of SD Times:
>Hi there. I read your article on the maturation of Python, and I'm
>looking for contributors to the Python project. I'd love to talk to
>you on the phone for an SD Times article about the subject. I'd also
>appreciate any other members of the proje
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 09:20:23AM -0300, Facundo Batista wrote:
> I don't want to keep deferring 3.0 months and months, I prefer to have
> a redesigned schedule now, and stick to it as much as possible, even
> if the 3.0 version is not as robust as we would want.
Another, related policy issue: mu
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:48:49PM -0300, Facundo Batista wrote:
> And, if you pick up that bug six month later, or three year later, you
> lose twenty minutes reading the whole discussion, and then realize
> that neither you have the expertise to get a decision, and skip to the
> next bug.
...
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
