Welcome Roger!
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> Welcome, Roger! And thanks for volunteering to share some more of your, um,
> idle time to help the Python community.
>
> --Ned
>
> --
> Ned Deily
> n...@acm.org -- []
>
>
> ___
>
Welcome, Roger! And thanks for volunteering to share some more of your, um,
idle time to help the Python community.
--Ned
--
Ned Deily
n...@acm.org -- []
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mail
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:40 PM, serwy wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> My name is Roger Serwy and I would like to introduce myself. I am a
> graduate student at the University of Illinois in electrical and computer
> engineering. Python has been a primary language for my research in signal
> processing
Welcome!
-eric
On Mar 21, 2013 9:39 PM, "serwy" wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> My name is Roger Serwy and I would like to introduce myself. I am a
> graduate student at the University of Illinois in electrical and computer
> engineering. Python has been a primary language for my research in signal
>
Hi Everyone,
My name is Roger Serwy and I would like to introduce myself. I am a
graduate student at the University of Illinois in electrical and
computer engineering. Python has been a primary language for my research
in signal processing and the auditory system. I use IdleX almost daily
for
On 3/20/2013 11:26 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> In article
> ,
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> +lots, let's make it happen.
>
> Thanks everyone for your positive feedback. Roger has indicated he's
> still interested. I've pointed him at the developer's guide section for
> new committers, in particular,
Cool! Thank you, Ned, for picking up the subject.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> In article
> ,
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> +lots, let's make it happen.
>
> Thanks everyone for your positive feedback. Roger has indicated he's
> still interested. I've pointed him at the devel
On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> I would like to propose Roger Serwy be given commit privileges to work
> on IDLE.
+1 Roger would do a great job.
Raymond___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.p
In article
,
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> +lots, let's make it happen.
Thanks everyone for your positive feedback. Roger has indicated he's
still interested. I've pointed him at the developer's guide section for
new committers, in particular, sending ssh keys and signing up for this
list, and I'v
+1
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013, at 03:17 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> I would like to propose Roger Serwy be given commit privileges to work
> on IDLE. Roger has demonstrated long-term interest in IDLE and has been
> contributing to IDLE in a number of ways for years. He has submitted
> many patches for I
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> I would like to propose Roger Serwy be given commit privileges to work
> on IDLE. Roger has demonstrated long-term interest in IDLE and has been
> contributing to IDLE in a number of ways for years. He has submitted
> many patches for IDLE to
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> In article
> ,
> Eli Bendersky wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Victor Stinner
> > wrote:
> > > It's maybe not the right place to discuss that, but why is IDLE part
> > > of the Python stdlib? Can't we maintain IDLE outside Python?
2013/3/20 Ned Deily :
> Please, this is definitely not the right place to discuss the issue of
> IDLE in the stdlib. It has been discussed repeatedly and the conclusion
> is always that it is an important part of the batteries-included
> experience.
I don't propose to remove IDLE from the stdlib,
In article
,
Eli Bendersky wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Victor Stinner
> wrote:
> > It's maybe not the right place to discuss that, but why is IDLE part
> > of the Python stdlib? Can't we maintain IDLE outside Python? I guess
> > that maintaining it outside the stdlib would allow t
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> It's maybe not the right place to discuss that, but why is IDLE part
> of the Python stdlib? Can't we maintain IDLE outside Python? I guess
> that maintaining it outside the stdlib would allow to develop it
> faster and be able to upgrade it
It's maybe not the right place to discuss that, but why is IDLE part
of the Python stdlib? Can't we maintain IDLE outside Python? I guess
that maintaining it outside the stdlib would allow to develop it
faster and be able to upgrade it for old (unmaintained) Python
versions.
Packaging Python with
+1 oh please yes
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
On 3/19/2013 3:17 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
I would like to propose Roger Serwy be given commit privileges to work
on IDLE. Roger has demonstrated long-term interest in IDLE and has been
contributing to IDLE in a number of ways for years. He has submitted
many patches for IDLE to the tracker since a
+1
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
+1, he is pretty active. I've committed many his patches.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> I would like to propose Roger Serwy be given commit privileges to work
> on IDLE. Roger has demonstrated long-term interest in IDLE and has been
> contributing to IDLE in a number of w
I would like to propose Roger Serwy be given commit privileges to work
on IDLE. Roger has demonstrated long-term interest in IDLE and has been
contributing to IDLE in a number of ways for years. He has submitted
many patches for IDLE to the tracker since at least April 2008. He has
developed
21 matches
Mail list logo
