Thanks for the proposed text (even though I'm replying before I read it ;) .
As for the dates, it was intentional. Ends on a weekend so no one feels
rushed if they procrastinate and only do open source on weekends, plus Dec
16 is a date people can reason about in terms of the middle of the month.
> On Nov 30, 2018, at 4:49 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>
>> Le 30/11/2018 à 10:30, Eric V. Smith a écrit :
>>> On 11/30/2018 3:51 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> Oh yeah, one odd thing I noticed: according to PEP 8001, the vote runs
>>> from Dec. 1 to Dec. 16, i.e., two weeks + two days. Is this
Le 30/11/2018 à 10:30, Eric V. Smith a écrit :
> On 11/30/2018 3:51 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> Oh yeah, one odd thing I noticed: according to PEP 8001, the vote runs
>> from Dec. 1 to Dec. 16, i.e., two weeks + two days. Is this...
>> intentional? Of course 16 is a good round number, but it sti
On 11/30/2018 3:51 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Oh yeah, one odd thing I noticed: according to PEP 8001, the vote runs
from Dec. 1 to Dec. 16, i.e., two weeks + two days. Is this...
intentional? Of course 16 is a good round number, but it still seemed
strange. Maybe it's supposed to give us a littl
Oh yeah, one odd thing I noticed: according to PEP 8001, the vote runs
from Dec. 1 to Dec. 16, i.e., two weeks + two days. Is this...
intentional? Of course 16 is a good round number, but it still seemed
strange. Maybe it's supposed to give us a little wiggle room in case
the vote doesn't get sent
Hi all,
Since the vote's supposed to be starting in a few days, I figured it
would be good to finish up the fiddly details and avoid any
last-minute editing. So here's a draft proposal for the ballot
instructions and options: https://github.com/python/peps/pull/844
I also set up a test vote on CI
