On 4/01/2016 12:38 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 03.01.2016 05:19, Guido van Rossum wrote:
This hardly seems like a real problem, so let's not worry more about it
until someone actually needs help solving this.
For Andrew, it would have been a real problem, so IMO it's better
to be prepared for
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> Right, but people who have such a problem won't become contributors
> if a Github account is the prerequisite for this and most likely
> also won't bother asking for help. Others will either silently
> accept violating Github terms by using multiple accounts or
>A ignore po
On 03.01.2016 22:06, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 5:38 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
>> On 03.01.2016 05:19, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>> This hardly seems like a real problem, so let's not worry more about it
>>> until someone actually needs help solving this.
>>
>> For Andrew, i
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 5:38 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 03.01.2016 05:19, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > This hardly seems like a real problem, so let's not worry more about it
> > until someone actually needs help solving this.
>
> For Andrew, it would have been a real problem, so IMO it's better
On 03.01.2016 05:19, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> This hardly seems like a real problem, so let's not worry more about it
> until someone actually needs help solving this.
For Andrew, it would have been a real problem, so IMO it's better
to be prepared for it and let potential new contributors know t
This hardly seems like a real problem, so let's not worry more about it
until someone actually needs help solving this.
--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mai
For Django this has literally never come up.
Alex
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Another idea I had is could someone reach out to another project like
> Django or Go that switched to GitHub and see how they handled this
> situation for contributors? I don't feel I'm in a
Another idea I had is could someone reach out to another project like
Django or Go that switched to GitHub and see how they handled this
situation for contributors? I don't feel I'm in a good position to ask
about this since I personally don't have this issue so I don't think I
could judge what wou
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 at 07:14 Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 3 January 2016 at 00:12, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On 2 January 2016 at 13:46, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> >> I guess the PSF could refund any Github charges incurred to
> >> remedy the situation. Their smallest plan is USD 7 per month
> >> and accoun
On 3 January 2016 at 00:12, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 2 January 2016 at 13:46, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> I guess the PSF could refund any Github charges incurred to
>> remedy the situation. Their smallest plan is USD 7 per month
>> and account, so that would mean costs of USD 84 per year and
>> commit
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 5:46 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> So if you are using a free account for company purposes, you'd
> have to get a paid account for personal use to e.g. contribute
> to Python and clearly separate personal contributions from
> ones you make as employee.
>
In practice, I have s
On 2 January 2016 at 13:46, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> I guess the PSF could refund any Github charges incurred to
> remedy the situation. Their smallest plan is USD 7 per month
> and account, so that would mean costs of USD 84 per year and
> committer - this certainly within range of what the PSF can
On 02.01.2016 13:06, Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
> While the announcement today of the planned move of the Python repository to
> GitHub has no bearing
> whatsoever on my decision, I would note that GitHub's requirement that a
> person only have one
> account - to be used for both personal activity a
13 matches
Mail list logo
