On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 15:57, Eric Smith wrote:
> I'd suggest deleting the /repos/ URIs eventually (as in before the end of
> the year). I don't see the need to keep them around and have the maintenance
> burden.
Maybe, but it's currently like three lines in a script, not as if
there's a huge ma
Am 24.11.2010 15:53, schrieb Jesus Cea:
> On 24/11/10 14:48, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>> All ssh repos can now be accessed by using ssh://h...@hg.python.org/repo
>> instead of ssh://h...@hg.python.org/repos/repo. While the old way should
>> continue to work, the new address should be considered prefe
On 11/24/10 8:48 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
All ssh repos can now be accessed by using ssh://h...@hg.python.org/repo
instead of ssh://h...@hg.python.org/repos/repo. While the old way should
continue to work, the new address should be considered preferable.
I'd suggest deleting the /repos/ URIs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/11/10 14:48, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> All ssh repos can now be accessed by using ssh://h...@hg.python.org/repo
> instead of ssh://h...@hg.python.org/repos/repo. While the old way should
> continue to work, the new address should be considered pre
All ssh repos can now be accessed by using ssh://h...@hg.python.org/repo
instead of ssh://h...@hg.python.org/repos/repo. While the old way should
continue to work, the new address should be considered preferable.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
___
python-committers ma
