Re: [python-committers] New ncoghlan-bpo-29537-NEWS branch?

FYI the clearing out of branches that are no longer open for development is being discussed at https://github.com/python/core-workflow/issues/31 On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 at 17:08 Victor Stinner wrote: > Le 9 mars 2017 7:32 PM, "Brett Cannon" a écrit : > >

Re: [python-committers] New ncoghlan-bpo-29537-NEWS branch?

On Mar 09, 2017, at 02:30 PM, R. David Murray wrote: >If it isn't already in the devguide (I have to admit I haven't really >read the new guide yet), once you end up pulling one of those branches >into your remotes, it will stay there until you do: > >git remote prune > >The above will

Re: [python-committers] New ncoghlan-bpo-29537-NEWS branch?

Le 9 mars 2017 7:32 PM, "Brett Cannon" a écrit : In general I expect none of those branches to live longer than 24 hours as the PRs they were created for should be merged in less than an hour. If a branch is older than a day then it means someone probably forgot to delete the

Re: [python-committers] New ncoghlan-bpo-29537-NEWS branch?

On 10 March 2017 at 04:32, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 at 04:07 Nick Coghlan wrote: > >> On 9 March 2017 at 19:30, Victor Stinner >> wrote: >> >> Do we need need a kind of sandbox repository for experiments? >> >>

Re: [python-committers] New ncoghlan-bpo-29537-NEWS branch?

On Thu, 09 Mar 2017 18:32:13 +, Brett Cannon wrote: > On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 at 04:07 Nick Coghlan wrote: > > > On 9 March 2017 at 19:30, Victor Stinner wrote: > > > > Do we need need a kind of sandbox repository for experiments?

Re: [python-committers] New ncoghlan-bpo-29537-NEWS branch?

On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 at 04:07 Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 9 March 2017 at 19:30, Victor Stinner wrote: > > Do we need need a kind of sandbox repository for experiments? > > > Mine aren't experiments, they're temporary branches from using the online >