With Tim's and Guido's latest suggestions,
+1
--
~Ethan~
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:49:36AM +0200, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
With the changes suggested by Guido, +1
(I've track
-1
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 12:45 AM Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> -1.
>
> Registering my vote. I studied only the PEP and didn't follow the
> debate/discussion.
>
> ___
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers@python.org
>
-1.
Registering my vote. I studied only the PEP and didn't follow the
debate/discussion.
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct:
-1
//arry/
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> I propose a poll because I'm unable to track the opinion of each core
> dev, too many emails have been sent to python-dev, and maybe some
> people changed their mind during the long discussion (which started in
>
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 2:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
>
>
-1 as currently proposed, +0 on Tim’s more bounded approach from the
mailing list
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 4:38 AM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> -1, I think, though I'm frustrated that in the parts of the list
> discussion I had energy to read, its proponents seemed to be saying
> that
-1, I think, though I'm frustrated that in the parts of the list
discussion I had energy to read, its proponents seemed to be saying
that the most compelling examples aren't actually in the PEP (and I
don't know what they are).
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 2:49 AM, Victor Stinner
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> * +1: you like the PEP
> * -1: you dislike the PEP
> * 0: you are not sure if you like it or not, or you have no opinon
> * don't reply to this poll :-)
>
-1
___
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 2:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
>
>
On 2018-05-02 11:49, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
>
>https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0572/
>
> The poll is on the
-1: dislike
> On May 2, 2018, at 2:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> The poll is on the *current* PEP. I propose 4 choices:
>
> * +1: you like the PEP
> * -1: you dislike the PEP
> * 0: you are not sure if you like it or not, or you have no opinon
> * don't reply to this
I'd very much like the feature, but not sure that the proposed change
is a good fit today.
-Rob
On 2 May 2018 at 22:13, Victor Stinner wrote:
> 2018-05-02 11:56 GMT+02:00 Paul Moore :
>> On 2 May 2018 at 10:49, Victor Stinner
On 02May2018 0249, Victor Stinner wrote:
* +1: you like the PEP
* -1: you dislike the PEP
I love the PEP, it's one of the better ones for sure. :) I just don't
like the proposed change.
-1
Cheers,
Steve
___
python-committers mailing list
On 5/2/2018 5:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
You asked two different questions, hence two answers.
1. The title asks "Do I like the PEP 572 Assignment Expressions"?
Yes, at least +.5, and if forced, I might well round up to 1.
The poll is on the *current* PEP. I propose 4 choices:
2. However,
02.05.18 23:27, Serhiy Storchaka пише:
I will not use it if it's accepted, and likely will not make reviews
of patches that use it.
I meant that this feature looks so bad to me, that it will be painful to
me even to read a Python code that uses it.
02.05.18 12:49, Victor Stinner пише:
The poll is on the *current* PEP. I propose 4 choices:
* +1: you like the PEP
* -1: you dislike the PEP
* 0: you are not sure if you like it or not, or you have no opinon
* don't reply to this poll :-)
Just reply to this email with "+1", "0", "-1". Please
-1
--
Julien Palard
https://mdk.fr
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
-1
-Stefan
> > On May 2, 2018, at 2:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> > Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> > talk at the Language Summit:
> >
> >
-1
--
Best regards,
Łukasz Langa
> On May 2, 2018, at 2:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
>
>
-1
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
>
>
+1
On 2 May, 2018, at 10:49, Victor Stinner
> wrote:
* +1: you like the PEP
* -1: you dislike the PEP
* 0: you are not sure if you like it or not, or you have no opinon
* don't reply to this poll :-)
> * +1: you like the PEP
> * -1: you dislike the PEP
> * 0: you are not sure if you like it or not, or you have no opinon
> * don't reply to this poll :-)
+1
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
+0.5
Stefan Krah
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
-1
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:02 AM Eric Snow
wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> > The poll is on the *current* PEP. I propose 4 choices:
> >
> > * +1: you like the PEP
> > * -1: you dislike the PEP
> > * 0: you are
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> The poll is on the *current* PEP. I propose 4 choices:
>
> * +1: you like the PEP
> * -1: you dislike the PEP
> * 0: you are not sure if you like it or not, or you have no opinon
> * don't reply to this poll :-)
>
> Just
FWIW, -1 from me. At least with the PEP as it stands.
Paul
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
On 2 May 2018 at 19:49, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
>
>https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0572/
>
-1 in the current form, since an expression such as
[y := f(x), x/y] ...
is confusing (I'd read this as [y := (f(x), x/y)]
Using explicit parens around it would resolve this issue:
[(y := f(x)), x/y] ...
but even with that, I'm not excited about the additional
line noise this adds -
2018-05-02 11:49 GMT+02:00 Victor Stinner :
> Just reply to this email with "+1", "0", "-1". Please don't elaborate
> here, it's just a quick poll, use python-dev if you want to talk :-)
FYI if you want don't to spam python-committers list, you may reply to
me in private. I
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
>
>
2018-05-02 11:56 GMT+02:00 Paul Moore :
> On 2 May 2018 at 10:49, Victor Stinner wrote:
>> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
>> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
>> talk at the Language
On 2 May 2018 at 10:49, Victor Stinner wrote:
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
Do we really need this spilling over into yet another
-1: dislike
Regards
Antoine.
Le 02/05/2018 à 11:49, Victor Stinner a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
>
>
-1: dislike
( my rationale:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-April/152991.html )
Victor
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct:
Hi,
I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
talk at the Language Summit:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0572/
The poll is on the *current* PEP. I propose 4 choices:
* +1: you like the PEP
*
37 matches
Mail list logo