Hi Mark,
Le jeu. 7 mai 2020 à 15:53, Mark Shannon a écrit :
> I say no. Why the sudden urgency?
My urgency was to be able to quickly see if per-interpreter GIL would
be doable for Python 3.9 or not. The answer is no: there is too much
work to be done to write a "correct" implementation. I'm talk
Hi Victor,
I say no. Why the sudden urgency?
I think that you are making too many assumptions about how
inter-interpreter communication is going to work, and about sharing of
objects.
On 06/05/2020 6:49 pm, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
tl; dr I'm asking for your permission to merge the follow
I am moving home this week and do not have time to review.
But I want to notice about the difference between --enable-X and --with-X.
See https://autotools.io/autoconf/arguments.html
Since isolated subinterpreter is not external dependency,
"--enable" should be used here.
(I know we already abus
Yes, it can wait until 3.9 branch is created and master becomes the future 3.10.
Victor
Le mer. 6 mai 2020 à 21:40, Brett Cannon a écrit :
>
> Can we wait until after 3.10 development opens up? And could it be a `-X`
> flag?
> ___
> python-committers
Can we wait until after 3.10 development opens up? And could it be a `-X` flag?
___
python-committers mailing list -- python-committers@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-committers-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/py
