Re: [python-committers] Turning off AppVeyor as required

2018-06-10 Thread Victor Stinner
Brett Cannon just made AppVeyor required again on 2.7, 3.6, 3.7 and master ;-) Victor 2018-06-04 21:38 GMT+01:00 Victor Stinner : > I have very good news from AppVeyor: > > * AppVeyor runs again jobs on pull requests: it's back! > * Issue with quotas: it was a disk issue, it was on their side and

Re: [python-committers] Turning off AppVeyor as required

2018-06-04 Thread Victor Stinner
I have very good news from AppVeyor: * AppVeyor runs again jobs on pull requests: it's back! * Issue with quotas: it was a disk issue, it was on their side and it's now fixed. * AppVeyor donate us additional parallel job to the python account! Moreover: * They proposed us to extend the timeout t

Re: [python-committers] Turning off AppVeyor as required

2018-06-04 Thread Steve Dower
bject: Re: [python-committers] Turning off AppVeyor as required By the way, Python 2.7 doesn't have AppVeyor nor VSTS? Is there a plan to add VSTS to Python 2.7? Victor 2018-06-04 18:46 GMT+02:00 Steve Dower : > On 04Jun2018 0932, Victor Stinner wrote: >> >> 2018-06-04 18:

Re: [python-committers] Turning off AppVeyor as required

2018-06-04 Thread Victor Stinner
By the way, Python 2.7 doesn't have AppVeyor nor VSTS? Is there a plan to add VSTS to Python 2.7? Victor 2018-06-04 18:46 GMT+02:00 Steve Dower : > On 04Jun2018 0932, Victor Stinner wrote: >> >> 2018-06-04 18:18 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon : >>> >>> I'm currently not in the mood to argue about VSTS'

Re: [python-committers] Turning off AppVeyor as required

2018-06-04 Thread Steve Dower
On 04Jun2018 0932, Victor Stinner wrote: 2018-06-04 18:18 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon : I'm currently not in the mood to argue about VSTS' stability so I don't feel comfortable flipping that on as a requirement quite yet. I don't suggest to make it mandatory right now. I will try to keep on eye on

Re: [python-committers] Turning off AppVeyor as required

2018-06-04 Thread Victor Stinner
2018-06-04 18:18 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon : > I'm currently not in the mood to argue about VSTS' stability so I don't feel > comfortable flipping that on as a requirement quite yet. I don't suggest to make it mandatory right now. I will try to keep on eye on VSTS ;-) Victor ___

Re: [python-committers] Turning off AppVeyor as required

2018-06-04 Thread Mariatta Wijaya
> > miss-islington currently ignores VSTS status No it does not yet ignore VSTS status. If VSTS status failed, it will not automerge. Mariatta ᐧ ___ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/p

Re: [python-committers] Turning off AppVeyor as required

2018-06-04 Thread Brett Cannon
I'm currently not in the mood to argue about VSTS' stability so I don't feel comfortable flipping that on as a requirement quite yet. On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 at 08:33 Victor Stinner wrote: > Hum. For backports, should we stop to approve PRs in advance? > miss-islington currently ignores VSTS status a

Re: [python-committers] Turning off AppVeyor as required

2018-06-04 Thread Victor Stinner
Hum. For backports, should we stop to approve PRs in advance? miss-islington currently ignores VSTS status and so may merge a backport even if VSTS Windows fails. Victor 2018-06-04 17:02 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon : > Victor noticed that AppVeyor stopped building about 19 hours ago, leading to > it b

[python-committers] Turning off AppVeyor as required

2018-06-04 Thread Brett Cannon
Victor noticed that AppVeyor stopped building about 19 hours ago, leading to it blocking all open PRs. I have gone ahead and switched off requiring AppVeyor for now, so please pay attention to at least the Windows VSTS status check to make sure you're not breaking Windows by accident. _