I'm not sure that you'd see much savings. You'd only get deltas that were never
merged to master excluded. Point taken though.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 4, 2016, at 4:18 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 at 13:14 Donald Stufft
On Jan 04, 2016, at 02:09 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>I currently often rely on a single Hg clone containing all branches.
I do hope that a single repo will contain all the branches, though I wouldn't
mind too much if we split Python 2 and 3 into separate repos. git worktree is
a nice tool if
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
> I'm not sure that you'd see much savings. You'd only get deltas that were
> never merged to master excluded. Point taken though.
>
Is the expectation that a Git clone would be significantly larger than an
Hg clone of an
понеділок, 04-січ-2016 21:18:39 Brett Cannon написано:
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 at 13:14 Donald Stufft wrote:
> > On Jan 4, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > It’s pretty easy to migrate the entire history (at least what’s in Hg)
> > including all branches