On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I blindly assume that non of us is going to say "Give me bucks or I won't
> code any more". But our economy is going through a recession, everything is
> getting more expensive by the day. A constant income would allow s
Anthony Baxter wrote:
What would this professionalisation get us that we don't have now? As
far as I can see, the biggest hole at the moment (as always) is with
people to trawl the tracker and triage bug reports and patches.
It would get us one or some developers who can work 8+ hours a day, fi
My preferred planning strategy is to decide on the goals and then try to
work out how to achieve them. The PSF will take direction from its
members and from active developers. But Christian is right about the
absence of a business plan.
Perhaps when the current release phase is over we need to
What would this professionalisation get us that we don't have now? As
far as I can see, the biggest hole at the moment (as always) is with
people to trawl the tracker and triage bug reports and patches.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Antoine Pitrou w
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Ubuntu's sophisticated release plan is certainly justified by its
business model, and the desire to both appeal to the open source people
and the corporate people without creating two different distributions.
I don't think Python has the same business requirements (neither
Le jeudi 14 août 2008 à 16:33 +0200, Christian Heimes a écrit :
> Perhaps we could adopt a release plan similar to Ubuntu. They have
> releases with cool, new and bleeding edge stuff followed by a release
> that focuses on stability and long term support.
Ubuntu's sophisticated release plan is c
