Re: [python-committers] Statistics: growth of core dev number vs growth of the code size/complexity

Ezio: > Nowadays the situation is much better, Python is more stable and > mature, and what's left is more difficult, obscure, or controversial. > There are still new modules and features being added and ISTM that > most of the new core devs are working on those (e.g. > asyncio/typing/etc), but

Re: [python-committers] Statistics: growth of core dev number vs growth of the code size/complexity

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 at 15:17 Victor Stinner wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I wrote a quick & dirty parser to compute statistics on *new* CPython >> core developer per year using the following page as

Re: [python-committers] Statistics: growth of core dev number vs growth of the code size/complexity

On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 at 15:17 Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > > I wrote a quick & dirty parser to compute statistics on *new* CPython > core developer per year using the following page as data: > https://devguide.python.org/developers/ > > 2007: 15 > 2008: 19 > 2009: 11 >

Re: [python-committers] Statistics: growth of core dev number vs growth of the code size/complexity

On Dec 6, 2017, at 18:17, Victor Stinner wrote: > I wrote a quick & dirty parser to compute statistics on *new* CPython > core developer per year using the following page as data: > https://devguide.python.org/developers/ > > 2007: 15 > 2008: 19 > 2009: 11 > 2010: 20 >

Re: [python-committers] Statistics: growth of core dev number vs growth of the code size/complexity

On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 12:17:04AM +0100, Victor Stinner wrote: > If you look at the size of the source code, it's still growing > constanly since 1990: > https://www.openhub.net/p/python/ > > 2007: around 783k lines > 2010: around 683k lines What happened between 2007 and 2010 that the source