Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
Having looked at the FieldStorage code, I'm guessing the idea was that
you parse fields as they come in and append them to a list. This
preserves the original order of fields, in case it is needed.
I'm not sure that maintaining a dictionary alongside the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-94?page=all ]
Deron Meranda updated MODPYTHON-94:
---
Component: core
change to core component
> Calling APR optional functions provided by mod_ssl
> --
>
>
Calling APR optional functions provided by mod_ssl
--
Key: MODPYTHON-94
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-94
Project: mod_python
Type: New Feature
Components: core
Versions: 3.2
Environmen
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-94?page=all ]
Deron Meranda updated MODPYTHON-94:
---
Attachment: requestobject.c.patch
This is a suggested patch against 3.2.5b which adds the ability to
access a couple mod_ssl optional functions.
I adde
I don't know how to do that, and it doesn't bother me that much :-)
Grisha
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, David Fraser wrote:
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
The Apache Software Foundation and The Apache HTTP Server Project are
pleased to announce the 3.2.5 Beta release mod_python.
Can we make s
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-94?page=all ]
Deron Meranda updated MODPYTHON-94:
---
Attachment: modpython4.tex.patch
This is a documentation patch which goes with the previously attached code
patch.
Made against 3.2.5b.
> Calling APR
The problem may lay somewhere outside of your control anyway, Grisha.
The original announcements on mod_python and python-dev did not have
SPAM added to the subject, so perhaps the problem lies with David's
server/email program.
Jim
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
I don't know how to do
Grisha,
Speaking of 3.2.5 beta, how long do we wait before it becomes final?
Jim
Hi,
Speaking of ordered dictionary :
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/weblog/arch_d7_2005_11_19.shtml#e140
Why is the ordering so important ? I do understand we need to support
multiple values per field name, but I don't see why ordering is
needed.
Regards,
Nicolas
2005/11/28, David Fraser <
A couple of weeks perhaps? I don't think the final can happen before
Apachecon without feeling rushed anyway, so we could target second half of
December?
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote:
Grisha,
Speaking of 3.2.5 beta, how long do we wait before it becomes final?
Jim
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
Having looked at the FieldStorage code, I'm guessing the idea was that
you parse fields as they come in and append them to a list. This
preserves the original order of fields, in case it is needed.
I assumed that as well, but I'm not sure getting the field
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
Why is the ordering so important ? I do understand we need to support
multiple values per field name, but I don't see why ordering is
needed.
I think that it may be dictated by some RFC (the stdlib does it this way
too), I'm not sure, but it's a goo
If you provide say FieldStorage.make_dict that returns a dictionary, then I
don't see why the order of the keys is important when the original list is
still available.
Nick
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
Hi,
Speaking of ordered dictionary :
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/weblog/arch_d7_2005_11_1
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
A couple of weeks perhaps? I don't think the final can happen before
Apachecon without feeling rushed anyway, so we could target second half
of December?
Sounds good. But are you not at least a little bit tempted to have it
have it ready to go so that you
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
Why is the ordering so important ? I do understand we need to support
multiple values per field name, but I don't see why ordering is
needed.
I think that it may be dictated by some RFC (the stdlib does it this wa
According to the W3C, "The control names/values are listed in the
order they appear in the document."
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/interact/forms.html#h-17.13.4.1
But that doesn't say anything about the server side...
Relying on the field order is a mark of sloppy programming IMHO.But
maybe t
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
According to the W3C, "The control names/values are listed in the
order they appear in the document."
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/interact/forms.html#h-17.13.4.1
Which also says to "Please consult [RFC2388] for additional
information." without actually saying that it
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-94?page=comments#action_12358711
]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-94:
---
Can Apache be built without HTTPS support? Does this patch still work and does
it gracefully fail or give negative re
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
Why is the ordering so important ? I do understand we need to support
multiple values per field name, but I don't see why ordering is
needed.
Because there are applications out there that will break if you change
it. Besides that, think about a form with a few text entry
Is anyone else subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It was that one
that had the SPAM in the subject, and my mail server doesn't have the
ability to add these :-)
Jim Gallacher wrote:
The problem may lay somewhere outside of your control anyway, Grisha.
The original announcements on mod_python and
2005/11/29, Mike Looijmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
> > Why is the ordering so important ? I do understand we need to support
> > multiple values per field name, but I don't see why ordering is
> > needed.
>
> Because there are applications out there that will break if you chang
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-94?page=comments#action_12358754
]
David Fraser commented on MODPYTHON-94:
---
I wonder whether it would be possible to use a module like ctypes to connect to
Apache functions. That way the linking issue
2005/11/29, Nicolas Lehuen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2005/11/29, Mike Looijmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
> > > Why is the ordering so important ? I do understand we need to support
> > > multiple values per field name, but I don't see why ordering is
> > > needed.
> >
> > Because
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
One proposal was to use an OrderedHashtable. As you can see, the reply
was quite definite :
"No. There is nothing in the spec that says that these parameters should be
in any sort of order. CGI scripts that expect them to be in order are coded
incorrectly IMHO."
Standin
24 matches
Mail list logo
