Just FYI in that case :
E:\Documents and Settings\Nico>python
ActivePython 2.4.1 Build 247 (ActiveState Corp.) based on
Python 2.4.1 (#65, Jun 20 2005, 17:01:55) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import imp
>>> imp.find_
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Jim Gallacher wrote ..
It's a strange one. When I move site-packages/PIL to
site-packages/PIL.bak (leaving PIL.pth as is) and run the tests I get
the same output as Graham and Nicolas. I'm just going to ignore this for
the time being and go with a refactored unit test.
Jim Gallacher wrote ..
> It's a strange one. When I move site-packages/PIL to
> site-packages/PIL.bak (leaving PIL.pth as is) and run the tests I get
> the same output as Graham and Nicolas. I'm just going to ignore this for
> the time being and go with a refactored unit test.
I am making a gues
FWIW, I use Python 2.3 on Mac OS X. Nicolas is probably using Win32
as usual.
I mention this as I wouldn't be surprised if different versions of Python
on different platforms behaved differently when given strange module
names for importing.
Take as an example prior case where someone was using "
Ok, this is weird. I've run the tests on a couple of my qemu images and
I get the same output as Nicolas and Graham in the error log, but a
different output for my development machine. I think I'll rewrite the
test to just check the response from the request rather than rooting
around in the er
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
On 12/01/2006, at 11:10 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
Jim Gallacher (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-98?
page=comments#action_12362399 ] Jim Gallacher commented on
MODPYTHON-98:
Applied Graham's
On 12/01/2006, at 11:10 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
Jim Gallacher (JIRA) wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-98?
page=comments#action_12362399 ] Jim Gallacher commented on
MODPYTHON-98:
Applied Graham's suggestions so all these
