[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-47?page=all ]
Graham Dumpleton updated MODPYTHON-47:
--
Attachment: MP47_20060309_grahamd_2.diff
Attached alternate suggested fix as "MP47_20060309_grahamd_2.diff".
I should have just done it this way
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-47?page=comments#action_12369573
]
Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-47:
I'm don't really like this patch (MP47_20060307_grahamd_1.diff) as it bypasses
any authorization or access checks in the ob
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-107?page=comments#action_12369565
]
Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-107:
-
Patch looks reasonable. I don't see any problem with PSP.run() not immediately
flushing its output as the user can still
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-109?page=all ]
Graham Dumpleton updated MODPYTHON-109:
---
Attachment: MP109_20060308_grahamd_1.diff
Attached "MP109_20060308_grahamd_1.diff" containing proposed changes.
All this does is prevent pytho
Okay, the reason that the failing code wasn't detected was because
the test searched for the presence of a specific string in the
error log file. Problems was that that string appeared in the
Python exception generated by the incorrect code.
[Wed Mar 08 21:01:12 2006] [notice] mod_python: (Re)imp
Nicolas
A while back you made the following change:
r378072 | nlehuen | 2006-02-16 06:41:25 +1100 (Thu, 16 Feb 2006) | 5
lines
- Fixed the unit tests for apache.register_cleanup
server.register_cleanup. Ther
e is not way it could have passed before, yet it did ???
- Corrected the documentat
