Not seeing any negatives, I am going to go ahead and commit the SSI
stuff. Comments that this is just another way to skin a cat are true,
even if a small cat. I guess the reason for doing it is to fill out
those basic features that can be filled out by using just what Apache
provides.
Anyway,
* Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Not seeing any negatives, I am going to go ahead and commit the SSI
stuff. Comments that this is just another way to skin a cat are true,
even if a small cat. I guess the reason for doing it is to fill out
those basic features that can be filled out by using just
On 12/03/2006, at 8:25 PM, André Malo wrote:
* Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Not seeing any negatives, I am going to go ahead and commit the SSI
stuff. Comments that this is just another way to skin a cat are true,
even if a small cat. I guess the reason for doing it is to fill out
those basic
On 12/03/2006, at 9:04 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
On 12/03/2006, at 8:25 PM, André Malo wrote:
* Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Not seeing any negatives, I am going to go ahead and commit the SSI
stuff. Comments that this is just another way to skin a cat are true,
even if a small cat. I guess
I'm -1 on get_session() too. The request object is supposed to be a
representation of Apache's request, and get_session() just does not belong
there.
Grisha
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
I handn't really intended to start working on an implementation. I just don't
like seeing
