[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-38?page=comments#action_12418012
]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-38:
---
Some of the unfinished session object issues in this entry split out into
MODPYTHON-175 and MODPYTHON-176.
This entr
Having a conversation using comments within jira seems really weird.
Anyone else? Just me?
Especially when all I want to say is I agree. :)
Graham Dumpleton (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-38?page=comments#action_65564 ]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODP
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-38?page=comments#action_65506 ]
Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-38:
Explicitly checking for req.session within PSP.run would also fix an unreported
bug, where the calling code uses a Session
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-38?page=comments#action_65495 ]
Nicolas Lehuen commented on MODPYTHON-38:
-
The comment above is not really true. We have to modify __init__ as well so
that the instance does not get initialized m
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-38?page=comments#action_65494 ]
Nicolas Lehuen commented on MODPYTHON-38:
-
We could also solve the problem by modifying the FieldStorage and Session
constructors, so that if the req object alread
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-38?page=comments#action_65493 ]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-38:
---
Whoops, got the following code wrong in a couple of ways:
global_scope.update({"req":req.form, "session":req.se
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-38?page=comments#action_65491 ]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-38:
---
Adding more to this and why PSP should check for req.form and also set req.form
if it is the first to create the form
