Michel Jouvin wrote:
0 : HP Tru64, mpm-worker
In fact 3.2.6b runs as 3.2.5b. Basically in real context it works except
the fact that after a segfault in the Apache child or a signal received
other than TERM or USR1, it doesn't reinitialize properly and forbid
proper reinitialization o
0 : HP Tru64, mpm-worker
In fact 3.2.6b runs as 3.2.5b. Basically in real context it works except
the fact that after a segfault in the Apache child or a signal received
other than TERM or USR1, it doesn't reinitialize properly and forbid proper
reinitialization of the new Apache chi
+1
MacOS-10.4.4
Apache-2.0.55 mpm-prefork
Python-2.4.2
cheers,
Ron
Ron Reisor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (RWR3)
University of Delaware Information Technologies/Network and Systems Services
Computing Center/192 South Chapel Street/Newark DE, 19716
pgp finger print: 0D 73 06 6F D3 6A 99 D3 F5 D5 6E F
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1 Linux (amd64) Ubuntu Breezy (5.10), apache 2.0.54 (mpm-worker),
python 2.4
Jim Gallacher wrote:
| A new mod_python 3.2.6 beta tarball is now available for testing.
| Nicolas has built windows versions for Python 2.4 and Python 2.3 which
| should a
+1 Gentoo [current], Apache-2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python-2.4, gcc-3.4.4
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> A new mod_python 3.2.6 beta tarball is now available for testing.
> Nicolas has built windows versions for Python 2.4 and Python 2.3 which
> should also be available at www.modpython.org/dist shortly.
>
+1 Slackware 10.1, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4
Jim Gallacher wrote:
$ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
$ make
$ (su)
# make install
Then (as non-root user!)
$ cd test
$ python test.py
What are the chances of enhancing the procedure as follows:
$ ./configure --with-apxs=
A new mod_python 3.2.6 beta tarball is now available for testing.
Nicolas has built windows versions for Python 2.4 and Python 2.3 which
should also be available at www.modpython.org/dist shortly.
This release is similar to 3.2.5b but fixes a couple of issues -
MODPYTHON-95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 10
Graham Dumpleton wrote ..
> The only other candidates that one might seriously consider are:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-105
>
> Simple change and Grisha agreed that should truncate output for HEAD.
That should have said "should NOT truncate".
Graham
perusal
> indicates that the only outstanding issue that should be included in 3.2
> is http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-106.
>
> If this is correct I'll commit Graham's patch tonight and roll the
> 3.2.6b tarball. Let's try and get 3.2 final out a
that should be included in 3.2
is http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-106.
If this is correct I'll commit Graham's patch tonight and roll the
3.2.6b tarball. Let's try and get 3.2 final out asap.
Jim
2005/12/28, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Grisha, I have though asked for a small change to be made which will
> allow me to make available a proposed new module importer when its done
> and for people be able to trial it without having to patch their source
> code. See:
>
>http://www
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
I hope everyone's having a merry Christmas or whatever other holidays
you're celebrating :-)
Oh yes indeed. :)
I haven't been following the list very closely lately, but it looks like
last time 3.2.6b was brought up a bunch of bugs
everyone's having a merry Christmas or whatever other holidays
you're celebrating :-)
I haven't been following the list very closely lately, but it looks
like
last time 3.2.6b was brought up a bunch of bugs came out of the
woodwork.
Does it look like we're near being ready to roll 3.2.6b now?
Grisha
r other holidays
> you're celebrating :-)
>
> I haven't been following the list very closely lately, but it looks like
> last time 3.2.6b was brought up a bunch of bugs came out of the woodwork.
>
> Does it look like we're near being ready to roll 3.2.6b now?
>
> Grisha
>
I hope everyone's having a merry Christmas or whatever other holidays
you're celebrating :-)
I haven't been following the list very closely lately, but it looks like
last time 3.2.6b was brought up a bunch of bugs came out of the woodwork.
Does it look like we're near
Hi Graham,
It looks like this can't break anything since the init() function is
called once per interpreter (no multithreading problem). So +1 for me.
Regards,
Nicolas
2005/12/18, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 18/12/2005, at 3:09 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>
> > We had talked about
On 18/12/2005, at 3:09 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
We had talked about doing a 3.2 final release just after ApacheCon.
A couple of things have cropped up which we have (or should) fix, but
these will not be substantial changes from 3.2.5b. As such I think we
should do another beta followed very
We had talked about doing a 3.2 final release just after ApacheCon.
A couple of things have cropped up which we have (or should) fix, but
these will not be substantial changes from 3.2.5b. As such I think we
should do another beta followed very quickly by a final release. Any new
bugs that cro
18 matches
Mail list logo
