Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-14 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Jim Gallacher wrote .. > Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > Is my list of suggested JIRA items then seen as being reasonable for > > such a projected release? > > This seems reasonable, since we have either already committed the fixes > or have patches available (I think). I don't have changes ready for

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-14 Thread Jim Gallacher
Graham Dumpleton wrote: Is my list of suggested JIRA items then seen as being reasonable for such a projected release? This seems reasonable, since we have either already committed the fixes or have patches available (I think). Do we want to create a new JIRA issue for the mutex directory i

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-14 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Is my list of suggested JIRA items then seen as being reasonable for such a projected release? Do we want to create a new JIRA issue for the mutex directory issue and also include a fix for that, but limit it to just an option to configure to override the directory? Graham Nicolas Lehuen wrote .

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-14 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Grisha wrote .. > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Nicolas Lehuen wrote: > > > 2006/2/14, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > [...] > >> If we want to go down the path of having interim 3.2 bug rollup releases > >> while 3.3 is being developed, might I suggest that we target the following > >> for su

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-14 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Nicolas Lehuen wrote: 2006/2/14, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] If we want to go down the path of having interim 3.2 bug rollup releases while 3.3 is being developed, might I suggest that we target the following for such a release in the near future. MODPYTHO

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-14 Thread Jim Gallacher
Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Based on today's traffic on the mailing lists, I think that we should go for a short-term 3.2.8 release of mod_python, with certified Apache 2.2 support on multiple platforms. The code is only there but I suppose we'll need a lot of testing, so maybe we could expect to relea

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-14 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
2006/2/14, Nicolas Lehuen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Based on today's traffic on the mailing lists, I think that we should > go for a short-term 3.2.8 release of mod_python, with certified Apache > 2.2 support on multiple platforms. The code is only there but I > suppose we'll need a lot of testing, so

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-14 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
Based on today's traffic on the mailing lists, I think that we should go for a short-term 3.2.8 release of mod_python, with certified Apache 2.2 support on multiple platforms. The code is only there but I suppose we'll need a lot of testing, so maybe we could expect to release this in a month or tw

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-13 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
2006/2/14, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] > If we want to go down the path of having interim 3.2 bug rollup releases > while 3.3 is being developed, might I suggest that we target the following > for such a release in the near future. > > MODPYTHON-77 > > The Simplified GIL Aquisitio

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-13 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Jim Gallacher wrote .. > Jorey Bump wrote: > > Jim Gallacher wrote: > > > >> This is how I would set priorities: > > > > > >> Try and assign most of the issues to someone. This is a bit of PR > >> spin, but I think it looks bad when there are a large number of open > >> issues with no assignee.

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-13 Thread Jim Gallacher
Graham Dumpleton wrote: As Jim pointed out a while back, we need to get going on mod_python 3.3 before I fill up JIRA with another page of bug reports or suggestions. I think you already *have* filled another page since I made that comment. ;) That said, how do we want to proceed on this? Do