I think the best thing to do is just to go ahead and tag and a create a
tarball. Whether everyone was ready will become apparent during the
testing/voting.
Grisha
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote:
Are we on track to release a 3.2.0beta tarball today?
Regards,
Jim
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
I think the best thing to do is just to go ahead and tag and a create a
tarball. Whether everyone was ready will become apparent during the
testing/voting.
OK, I'll throw together some release notes (ie, changes from 3.1.x). Do
you want me to tag it as w
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote:
OK, I'll throw together some release notes (ie, changes from 3.1.x). Do you
want me to tag it as well?
Sure.
Subversion branch: tags/3-2-0-BETA1
mpversion.h: #define MPV_STRING "3.2.0-beta-1"
There shouldn't be a number after BETA (I did this befo
I was putting together the 3.2 beta release notes but ran out of gas.
I'll finish tomorrow when I'm more awake.
In the mean time, are there any 3.1.4 > 3.2.0 upgrade issues which need
to be documented? I can't think of any, but then I am half asleep. :)
Regards,
Jim
Apologies if this is a duplicate, mail delivery is screwing up real bad for me.
Grisha wrote ..
> > Subversion branch: tags/3-2-0-BETA1
> > mpversion.h: #define MPV_STRING "3.2.0-beta-1"
>
> There shouldn't be a number after BETA (I did this before, which is where
> you may have gotten the idea,
