Re: 3.2 beta release today?

2005-08-17 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote: What is the correct name for the tarball? mod_python-3.2.0-b.tgz, mod_python-3.2.0-BETA.tgz or something else? I like "mod_python-3.2.0b" and the tarball would be mod_python-3.2.0b.tgz Grisha

Re: mod_python 3.2.0-BETA has been tagged in subversion

2005-08-17 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
who-hoo!! On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote: It's been tagged. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_python/tags/release-3-2-0-BETA/ Regards, Jim

mod_python 3.2.0-BETA available for testing

2005-08-17 Thread Jim Gallacher
Here are the rules: In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to _this_ list*! (Not the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, and preferably not me

Re: mod_python 3.2.0-BETA available for testing

2005-08-17 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
OK, I think I have a -1 :-( checking for flex... no configure: error: flex binary not found in path flex shouldn't be required for build since the flex-generated psp_parser.c is already included? Aside from this I had a few tests fail - I'll have to take a look at the details tomorrow. This