Mike, I forward your +1 to python-dev since you only sent it to me.
Regards,
Nicolas
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mike Looijmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 18 janv. 2006 08:21
Subject: Re: mod_python 3.2.6 (Final!) available for testing
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Windows XP Pro S
+1
Fedora Core 4
Apache 2.0.54
Python 2.4.1
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> Good news everyone! I made a mistake in tagging 3.2.6 as beta instead of
> final. The new tarball is now available for testing. This is the same
> code as yesterday's 3.2.6b.tgz but with the correct version information.
>
> This
Since I have a CoLinux instance on my machine here, I wanted to give it
a go with mod_python as well (need a linux test environment for
mod_python anyway).
It's running a Debian distro, I have gcc-3.3 on it, as well as
apache2-dev and python-dev (version 2.3).
Can't get the tests to run thou
Mike Looijmans wrote:
Since I have a CoLinux instance on my machine here, I wanted to give it
a go with mod_python as well (need a linux test environment for
mod_python anyway).
It's running a Debian distro, I have gcc-3.3 on it, as well as
apache2-dev and python-dev (version 2.3).
Can't ge
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-110?page=comments#action_12363123
]
Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-110:
-
Discussion started on 2005-11-21:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.mod-python.devel/1875
> Tru64 v5.1B : mod_p
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
It looks like mod_python is making good progress and everyone
is collaborating in the Apache way of testing and voting.
That's great!
Unfortunately, I have almost no insight into who these great people
are that are doing the RM task and testing and voting and preparing
for
Jorey Bump wrote ..
> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > It looks like mod_python is making good progress and everyone
> > is collaborating in the Apache way of testing and voting.
> > That's great!
> >
> > Unfortunately, I have almost no insight into who these great people
> > are that are doing the RM t
Thanks Roy. Very timely, since 3.2.6 is (so far) going to be a
final/stable release.
I propose that for starters those people are:
me (I'm also in the Apache HTTP Server PMC)
Jim Gallacher
Nicolas Lehuen
Graham Dumpleton
Just to clarify this a bit - I think a +1 on successful test for a
par
Hi,
It's OK for me !
Regards,
Nicolas
2006/1/19, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Thanks Roy. Very timely, since 3.2.6 is (so far) going to be a
> final/stable release.
>
> I propose that for starters those people are:
>
> me (I'm also in the Apache HTTP Server PMC)
> Jim Gal
+1
:o)
Seriously, I think Grisha's way is right - the three musketeers should
decide based on the feedback they get. There's no substitute for running
on other people's machines...
--
Mike Looijmans
Philips Natlab / Topic Automation
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
Hi,
It's OK for me !
Regards,
Ni
10 matches
Mail list logo
