+1 Linux Debian Sid, apache 2.0.55 mpm-prefork, python 2.3.5
+1 Linux Debian Sid, apache 2.2.0 mpm-prefork, python 2.4.2
New Importer:
+1 Linux Debian Sid, apache 2.0.55 mpm-prefork, python 2.3.5
+1 Linux Debian Sid, apache 2.2.0 mpm-prefork, python 2.4.2
Jim Gallacher wrote:
mod_python-3.3.0-d
Nicolas, could you make a Win32 binary for us poor people?
--
Mike Looijmans
Philips Natlab / Topic Automation
And in addition to running the unit tests, try running your actual web
site with this release. That usually manages to bring up things the
developers never thought of - so that we can extend the unit tests with
those cases as well. I can imagine that some code may depend on some
specific behavi
Jim Gallacher wrote:
Mike Looijmans wrote:
And in addition to running the unit tests, try running your actual web
site with this release. That usually manages to bring up things the
developers never thought of - so that we can extend the unit tests
with those cases as well. I can imagine that
Hi,
Here are the binary for Apache 2.0 :
http://nicolas.lehuen.com/download/mod_python/
I also have a :
+1 for mod_python 3.3.0-dev-20060321 on Windows XP SP2 + ActivePython
2.4.2.10 + Apache 2.0.55
Unfortunately I still have some doubts about my tests on Apache
2.2.0... I'll see to that this
+1 for mod_python 3.3.0-dev-20060321 on Windows 2000 SP4 +
ActivePython 2.3.5.236 + Apache 2.0.55
However I have a -1 on Python 2.2 with a LOT of test failures, but I
guess we won't support Python 2.2 for mod_python 3.3 ?
Regards,
Nicolas
2006/3/22, Nicolas Lehuen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
>
-1 Slackware 10.1, Apache 2.2.0 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4
My applications are working, but make check produces these errors:
==
FAIL: test_req_auth_type (__main__.PerRequestTestCase)
-
2006/3/22, Nicolas Lehuen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> However I have a -1 on Python 2.2 with a LOT of test failures, but I
> guess we won't support Python 2.2 for mod_python 3.3 ?
Sorry, my -1 was due to a configuration problem, everything works on Python 2.2.
+1 for mod_python 3.3.0-dev-20060321 on W
Nicolas Lehuen wrote ..
> 2006/3/22, Nicolas Lehuen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > However I have a -1 on Python 2.2 with a LOT of test failures, but I
> > guess we won't support Python 2.2 for mod_python 3.3 ?
>
> Sorry, my -1 was due to a configuration problem, everything works on Python
> 2.2.
>
> +
Graham Dumpleton wrote ..
>
> On 23/03/2006, at 5:06 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
> > That's another reason to rewrite the unit tests. It's too hard to
> > sort out the wheat from the chaff.
> >
> > I don't think this is related to your failing test, but I noticed
> > the following, repeated numer
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Graham Dumpleton wrote ..
On 23/03/2006, at 5:06 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
That's another reason to rewrite the unit tests. It's too hard to
sort out the wheat from the chaff.
I don't think this is related to your failing test, but I noticed
the following, repeated
2006/3/22, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Nicolas Lehuen wrote ..
> > 2006/3/22, Nicolas Lehuen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > However I have a -1 on Python 2.2 with a LOT of test failures, but I
> > > guess we won't support Python 2.2 for mod_python 3.3 ?
> >
> > Sorry, my -1 was due to a con
12 matches
Mail list logo
