On Jun 23, 2005, at 10:11 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Skip Montanaro wrote:
>
>> I wrote PEP 304, "Controlling Generation of Bytecode Files":
>>
>> http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0304.html
>>
>
> I would like to see some way of having bytecode files put
> into platform/version dependent subdirecto
Skip Montanaro wrote:
> I wrote PEP 304, "Controlling Generation of Bytecode Files":
>
> http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0304.html
I would like to see some way of having bytecode files put
into platform/version dependent subdirectories, which
would make it easier e.g. to have Python code share
[Michael Hudson]
>> I've been looking at this area partly to try and understand this bug:
>>
>> [ 1163563 ] Sub threads execute in restricted mode
>>
>> but I'm not sure the whole idea of multiple interpreters isn't
>> inherently doomed :-/
[Martin v. Löwis]
> That's what Tim asserts, saying t
Tim Peters wrote:
> [Paolino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>
>>Hello developers,I noticed my application was growing strangely while I
>>was using type, then I tried this:
>>
>>while True:
>> type('A',(),{})
>>
>>and saw memory filling up.Is there a clean solution to that?
>>I see it as a bug in python en
Tim Peters wrote:
> [Paolino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>
>>Hello developers,I noticed my application was growing strangely while I
>>was using type, then I tried this:
>>
>>while True:
>> type('A',(),{})
>>
>>and saw memory filling up.Is there a clean solution to that?
>>I see it as a bug in python en
[Paolino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> Hello developers,I noticed my application was growing strangely while I
> was using type, then I tried this:
>
> while True:
> type('A',(),{})
>
> and saw memory filling up.Is there a clean solution to that?
> I see it as a bug in python engeneering,that is why I
Hello developers,I noticed my application was growing strangely while I
was using type, then I tried this:
while True:
type('A',(),{})
and saw memory filling up.Is there a clean solution to that?
I see it as a bug in python engeneering,that is why I wrote to you.
Thanks a lot
Paolino
___
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gareth McCaughan wrote:
>> [Keith Dart:]
>>>By "normal" integer I mean the mathematical definition.
>>
>> Then you aren't (to me) making sense. You were distinguishing
>> this from a unified int/long. So far as I can see, a unified int/long
>> type *does
