Thomas (Heller) and I have been discussing whether the zlib
module should become builtin, atleast on Win32 (i.e. part
of python25.dll). This would simplify py2exe, which then could
bootstrap extraction from the compressed file just with
pythonxy.dll (clearly, zlib.pyd cannot be *in* the compressed
Neal Norwitz wrote:
Also, I noticed several places where errors where being ignored. What
is the procedure for the element tree? Are we supposed to modify it
in the python SVN or treat it as read-only?
You should add a bug report on sf.net/projects/python, and assign
that to Fredrik Lundh.
Neal Norwitz wrote:
I'm not sure where the problem is, but this code leaks a reference:
parser = ET.XMLParser() ; parser.feed('xtext/x')
You need this to set it up:
from xmlcore.etree import cElementTree as ET
This isn't a memory leak according to valgrind.
looks like it's stealing
$ svn up
At revision 41759.
$ make
...
Python/compile.c: In function `PyNode_Compile':
Python/compile.c:301: parse error before `mod'
Python/compile.c:302: `mod' undeclared (first use in this function)
Python/compile.c:302: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
Hi Barry,
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:28:17PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Done. r41744.
Doesn't appear to work for me: sys.build_number receives the value from
the buildno. Looking at the Makefile, the reason is that I'm building
CPython in a separate directory (running '/some/path/configure;
Armin Rigo wrote:
Do we have any plan to make sys.build_number meaningful in the releases
as well (generally compiled from an svn export, as Michael pointed out),
or are we happy with a broken number in this case?
I'm actually a bit confused that Barry changed the meaning of build
number for
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Propose first. I have the feeling that the feature will change forth
and back if everybody gets to say something. I would call it
sys.svnversion (because that's what it is).
Perhaps it could make sense for sys.svnversion to exist only in a debug
build. This way people
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
what am I missing ?
a C++ compiler, obviously, the arena code used C++ (C99?) constructs
in a couple of places. I've checked in a fix.
C99 also allows to declare variables in the middle of a block.
Regards,
Martin
___
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
just noticed an embarrasing misspelling in one of my recent checkins, only
to find that I cannot fix it:
$ svn propedit --revprop -r 41759 svn:log
svn: Repository has not been enabled to accept revision propchanges;
ask the administrator to create a pre-revprop-change
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I have now installed this hook to allow editing svn:log; please try
again.
$ svn propedit --revprop -r 41759 svn:log
Set new value for property 'svn:log' on revision 41759
thanks! /F
___
Python-Dev mailing list
On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 18:58 +0100, Armin Rigo wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:28:17PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Done. r41744.
Doesn't appear to work for me: sys.build_number receives the value from
the buildno. Looking at the Makefile, the reason is that I'm building
CPython in a
On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 19:19 +0100, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
It stopped counting builds on Windows quite some time ago; perhaps it
is best to drop the build number entirely?
I think so, because it doesn't really convey anything useful.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Barry Warsaw wrote:
Yes, here's my thought: I have a mod to Makefile.pre.in and
getbuildinfo.c so that when we don't find .svn directory, we don't
define the BUILD macro when we compile getbuildinfo.c. Then, in that
file we have something like:
#ifndef BUILD
#define BUILD $Revision$
Scott David Daniels wrote:
I am trying to enable other compression forms in zipfile, in
particular bzip2, but eventually extensible. My primary intent
is to extend the useful life of .zips by allowing better
compression (and enabling reading and writing zip formats that
are starting to be
On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 23:48 +0100, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
What does that achieve? It will give you the latest revision at which
getbuildinfo was changed (currently 41744).
Dunno. It's better than nothing I guess.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
15 matches
Mail list logo
