Hi all,
I want to use the mmap module from python trunk with python 2.5.
On Linux I can easily replace it, as it is a dynamically loaded module. On
windows
it is a builtin module and I fear that I must compile python on windows (or
resort to some other ugly hack)
What is the reason for mmap being
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> sys.flags(debug=0, py3k_warning=0, division_warning=0, division_new=0,
>> inspect=-2147483647, interactive=-2147483647, optimize=0,
>> dont_write_bytecode=0, no_user_site=1, no_site=0, ingnore_environment=1,
>
> Is this a copy&paste error or a typo in the code ^ ?
It's
Brett Cannon writes:
> On Jan 22, 2008 8:47 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A reminder: 2.5.2 should only get bugfixes, new features.
>
> If Guido felt like dragging the time machine out he would catch his
> mistake and have that say "NO new features".
What, nothing abou
On Jan 20, 2008 5:54 PM, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would be useful is a method that generates (i.e., a generator in
> the Python sense) the (continued fraction) convergents to a rational.
> People wanting specific constraints on a rational approximation
> (including, but not limi
On Jan 22, 2008 8:47 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While the exact release schedule for 2.5.2 is still up in the air, I
> expect that it will be within a few weeks. This means that we need to
> make sure that anything that should go into 2.5.2 goes in ASAP,
> preferably this wee
While the exact release schedule for 2.5.2 is still up in the air, I
expect that it will be within a few weeks. This means that we need to
make sure that anything that should go into 2.5.2 goes in ASAP,
preferably this week. It also means that we should be very careful
what goes in though -- and we
>> And, would we lose the nice relationship expressed by:
>>
>> for elem in container:
>> assert elem in container
[Steven Bethard]
>We've already lost this if anyone really wants to break it::
>
>>>> class C(object):
>... def __iter__(self):
>... return iter(x
On Jan 22, 2008 5:40 PM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Daniel Stutzbach]
> > There are many places in the C implementation where a slot
> > returns an int rather than a PyObject. There other replies
> > in this thread seem to support altering the signature of the
> > slot to retu
[Daniel Stutzbach]
> There are many places in the C implementation where a slot
> returns an int rather than a PyObject. There other replies
> in this thread seem to support altering the signature of the
> slot to return a PyObject. Is this setting a precedent that
> _all_ slots should return
On Jan 22, 2008 3:46 PM, Daniel Stutzbach
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2008 1:26 PM, tomer filiba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> class Foo(object):
> > ... def __contains__(self, key):
> > ... return 17
> > ... def __eq__(self, other):
> > ... return 1
On Jan 22, 2008 1:26 PM, tomer filiba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> class Foo(object):
> ... def __contains__(self, key):
> ... return 17
> ... def __eq__(self, other):
> ... return 19
> ...
> >>>
> >>> f=Foo()
> >>> f == 8
> 19
> >>> 8 in f
> True
There are many
On 2008-01-20 19:30, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Yet another python executable could solve the issue, named "pythons" as
> python secure.
>
> /*
>gcc -DNDEBUG -g -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -IInclude -I. -pthread
>-Xlinker -lpthread -ldl -lutil -lm -export-dynamic -o pythons2.6
>
>py
The issue is that the sq_contains slot is defined as returning an int,
while the tp_richcompare slot is defined as returning a PyObject *.
Your first opportunity for changing this will be Py3k. Please submit a patch!
On Jan 22, 2008 11:26 AM, tomer filiba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm using py
My guess is that results from the bottom of cmp_outcome (ceval.c),
The default case handles the PyCmp_EQ case via PyObject_RichCompare,
which might not return Py_True or Py_False.
But 'in' is handled inside the switch and is subject to the final
statements:
v = res ? Py_True : Py_False;
i'm using python to create expression objects, for more intuitive
usage as
predicates, for instance:
x = (Arg(0) > 17) & (Arg(1).foo == "bar")
instead of
x = And(Gt(Arg(0), 17), Eq(GetAttr(Arg(1), "foo"), "bar"))
so now i can use x.eval(18, "spam") and get the result of the
expression.
i'
At 04:42 PM 1/22/2008 +0100, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>I don't really understand what all this has to do with per user
>site-packages.
>
>Note that the motivation for having per user site-packages
>was to:
>
> * address a common request by Python extension package users,
>
> * get rid off the hackery
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> I don't really understand what all this has to do with per user
> site-packages.
>
> Note that the motivation for having per user site-packages
> was to:
>
> * address a common request by Python extension package users,
>
> * get rid off the hackery done by setuptools in
I don't really understand what all this has to do with per user
site-packages.
Note that the motivation for having per user site-packages
was to:
* address a common request by Python extension package users,
* get rid off the hackery done by setuptools in order
to provide this.
As such the
Hi Martin,
Way back on Monday, 21 May 2007, you wrote:
> This is an issue to be discussed for Python 2.6. I'm personally
> hesitant to have the "official" build infrastructure deviate
> from the layout that has been in-use for so many years, as a lot
> of things depend on it.
>
> I don't find
19 matches
Mail list logo
