On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:15 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 02:21 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >>OTOH, I'd rat
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:15 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 02:21 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >>OTOH, I'd rather there be OOWTDI so whatever the consensus is is fine
> > >>with me.
> > >
> > >T
I'd object to it returning something that resembles a list too
closely, but I could live with str(range(3)) return <0, 1, 2>. We
should probably have a cutoff so that if there are more than 6 values
it'll show the first 3 values, then dots, then the last 2 values. (The
cutoff would be computed so t
Hi,
I use Python in my CS1 and CS2 curriculum and I have a question.
As I've been using the Python 3.0 alphas one of the things that I am
bothered by is that I cannot see the sequence produced by range
without introducing students to the list() function.
I typically introduce range on day 1 o
[snip]
>
>
>
> c) Strings as type declarations : Do you think I should use decorators
> instead at least for function type declarations?
You might be interested in 3.0's (and maybe 2.6's) function annotations. See
PEP 3107.
>
>
> thanks for patiently reading this,
> comments and inquiries sought.
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Avi Kohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am interested in understanding the python source code. Can someone
> direct me to resources (documentation,book,archive of mailling lists,etc)
> that will assist me ?
>
What part(s) do you want to learn about? The CPython int
> What is Spyke?
> In many performance critical projects, it is often necessary to
> rewrite parts of the application in C. However writing C wrappers can
> be time consuming. Spyke offers an alternative approach. You add
> annotations to your Python code as strings. These strings are
> discarded
> (Though as the saying goes, little duplication is normal (and perhaps
> wanted) for open source software.)
Sorry! I meant "a little", completely reversing the meaning of my sentence.
Dag Sverre
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http:
I am interested in understanding the python source code. Can someone direct
me to resources (documentation,book,archive of mailling lists,etc) that will
assist me ?
Thank you,
Avi
--
Avi Kohn
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail
On 06/04/2008, at 2:15 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> a) how does the binary get into the release tarball? You might argue
>that it doesn't have to, as it is sufficient when it is included in
>the Windows installer, however, as currently implemented,
>bdist_wininst also runs on Unix, and
Without an implementation and supporting profile data nobody is going
to believe that you can do name lookup faster than with the built-in
dict type in CPython. Note that names seen by the parser are already
interned, so most of what you seem to be proposing is already
implemented...
On Wed, Mar 5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Note the "rm: conftest.dSYM: is a directory". This occurred a few
> >> times during the configure process. Didn't cause it to conk out, but
> >> is annoying.
>
> Brett> I am assuming this is on your OS X machine, Skip?
>
> Yes, sorry. I forgot to m
"Rahul Garg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Note this message has been posted to numpy-discussion and python-dev.
| Sorry for the multiple posting but I thought both python devs and
| numpy users will be interested. If you believe your list should not
| receive this
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Trent Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nod, if SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE is used instead in the code I posted, Windows
> raises EADDRINUSE on the second bind(). I don't have access to any Linux
> boxes at the moment, so I can't test what sort of error is raised wit
Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
> b) IIRC, upx was used to compress these executables. I don't think the
>the current build process covers this, yet (but then, the current
>binaries might not be compressed with upx anymore, either - not
>sure whether that would be a bug). Of course, upx would
15 matches
Mail list logo
