On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Jesus Cea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Brett Cannon wrote:
>> Well, 'time' says the test takes 16.09 sec user and 16.09 sec system
>> on my MacBook, but a total execution time of almost 8 *minutes*. That
>> is too
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brett Cannon wrote:
> Well, 'time' says the test takes 16.09 sec user and 16.09 sec system
> on my MacBook, but a total execution time of almost 8 *minutes*. That
> is too long to be on by default.
Uh... That is very strange.
Under Solaris 10:
"
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Walter Dörwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> The code coverage site at http://coverage.livinglogic.de/ was broken for
> the last few months. It's fixed again now and runs the test suite once
> per day with
>
> regrtest.py -T -N -uurlfetch,largefile,
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Jean-Paul Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:26:05 +0200, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Maciej,
>>
>> Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm a little clueless about exact semantics of following
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:26:05 +0200, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello Maciej,
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Hello,
I'm a little clueless about exact semantics of following snippets:
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/85698/
is this fine?
or shall I fill the bug?
(the reason to ask
Hello all!
The code coverage site at http://coverage.livinglogic.de/ was broken for
the last few months. It's fixed again now and runs the test suite once
per day with
regrtest.py -T -N -uurlfetch,largefile,network,decimal
Servus,
Walter
___
Pyth
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Mark Seaborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes. The renaming of "im_self" and "im_func" is good. The removal of
> > unbound methods is a *big* problem [1].
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mark
> >
> > [1]
> > http://lacking
Hello Maciej,
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm a little clueless about exact semantics of following snippets:
>
> http://paste.pocoo.org/show/85698/
>
> is this fine?
> or shall I fill the bug?
> (the reason to ask is because a) django is relying on this b) pypy
> implements it different
В Птн, 19/09/2008 в 17:43 +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski пишет:
> Hello,
>
> I'm a little clueless about exact semantics of following snippets:
>
> http://paste.pocoo.org/show/85698/
>
> is this fine?
> or shall I fill the bug?
> (the reason to ask is because a) django is relying on this b) pypy
> im
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (09/12/08 - 09/19/08)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
2035 open (+36) / 13696 closed (+24) / 15731 total (+60)
Open issues with patches: 652
Average
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Hello,
I'm a little clueless about exact semantics of following snippets:
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/85698/
is this fine?
It looks right to me. :-)
In the first case the NameError is caught by the except and not
re-raised (but still enters the finally after th
Hello,
I'm a little clueless about exact semantics of following snippets:
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/85698/
is this fine?
or shall I fill the bug?
(the reason to ask is because a) django is relying on this b) pypy
implements it differently)
cheers,
fijal
___
+1.
I find the offline versions to be vital.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 19, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin points out that in the past, as part of the release process,
we've built separate downloadable documen
On Sep 19, 2008, at 7:20 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Martin points out that in the past, as part of the release process,
we've built separate downloadable documentation.
Do we still want to do that for Python 2.6 and 3.0, ...?
Yes, I think so. The downloads are very useful for people who
regu
PyPy offers sandboxing interpreter without compromising language
features itself. Here are docs:
http://codespeak.net/pypy/dist/pypy/doc/sandbox.html
Also, are you aware of directory Lib/test/crashers (in python's svn)
which contains some possible ways to segfault cpython? (which can lead
to compr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin points out that in the past, as part of the release process,
we've built separate downloadable documentation.
Do we still want to do that for Python 2.6 and 3.0, and if so, how do
we go about doing that? I have this feeling that building
16 matches
Mail list logo