Greetings!
I'm currently trying to assess the effort required for a CE port. I'm already
aware of the project at http://pythonce.sourceforge.net, but I find it a
waste of time to have two separate projects which then require syncing
changes back and forth.
Questions:
- What are the feelings
If I remember correctly (and based on a skimming of dictnotes.txt),
those aren't suggestions, it is documentation about the actual
implementation and why those decisions were made.
Well, some of the document is written as if we did X, then we'd see
Y so it's not always clear. Some parts are
Benjamin Peterson wound up writing a test case for the new C atexit module
on the py3k branch. A similar test, though different in detail, makes sense
for the Python atexit module on trunk. Is this something I can check in or
should I just wait until after 2.6 is released?
def
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 23, 2008, at 4:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Peterson wound up writing a test case for the new C atexit
module
on the py3k branch. A similar test, though different in detail,
makes sense
for the Python atexit module on trunk.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings!
I'm currently trying to assess the effort required for a CE port. I'm already
aware of the project at http://pythonce.sourceforge.net, but I find it a
waste of time to have two separate projects which then
I'm out of town this week for a conference (ICFP/CUFP in Victoria) and
my hotel's connection has been bad enough such that I can't get any
Real Work done so I've managed to hammer on the json library's
decoding quite a bit instead. I just released simplejson 1.9.3 which
improves decoding
