On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> a while back there was a discussion about new operators for the language,
> which
> ended in people mentioning that the status of PEP 225 was still undecided and
> that it was the most likely route to consider
Thanks to the flu that I am getting over I finally got around to start
writing the dev docs I have been planning to author for years. The
first one is how to get set up, with the draft at
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dg7fctr4_5457424jfh . Obviously any
corrections are appreciated.
About the only
Terry> If there are release notes, they could mention mp's availability
Terry> on pypi.
I think the best place to reference it would be in the 2.6/3.0 module
documentation.
Skip
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.pyt
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Skip Montanaro and others hackers started to port the multiprocessing module
to Python 2.4 and 2.5.
http://code.google.com/p/python-multiprocessing/
Is it planned to include it in 2.4.6 and/or 2.5.3?
Neither. For 2.4.x, we only accept security fixes; for 2.5.3, only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 8, 2008, at 8:41 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
The backported version of MP is on pypi. Fancy that.
SHHH! Don't tell Guido you've made dups of his time machine keys.
- -Barry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAw
On Nov 8, 2008, at 11:50 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The fix for 874900 is not a bad idea though.
Doing what specifically (that has not been done yet) is not a bad
idea?
Regards,
Martin
Nothing, I think you're correct and the fix is in 2.5
__
> The fix for 874900 is not a bad idea though.
Doing what specifically (that has not been done yet) is not a bad idea?
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
htt
On Nov 8, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 8, 2008, at 7:24 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Skip Montanaro and others hackers started to port the
multiprocessing module
to Python 2.4 and 2.5.
http://code.google.com/
No - multiprocessing should not go to the official 2.4/2.5 branches.
The PEP specified 2.6 and beyond.
The fix for 874900 is not a bad idea though.
On Nov 8, 2008, at 6:41 AM, Victor Stinner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Saturday 08 November 2008 00:07:33 Martin v. Löwis, vous avez écr
it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 8, 2008, at 7:24 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Skip Montanaro and others hackers started to port the
multiprocessing module
to Python 2.4 and 2.5.
http://code.google.com/p/python-multiprocessing/
Is it planned to include it in 2.4.6 and/or
> Skip Montanaro and others hackers started to port the multiprocessing module
> to Python 2.4 and 2.5.
>http://code.google.com/p/python-multiprocessing/
>
> Is it planned to include it in 2.4.6 and/or 2.5.3?
Neither. For 2.4.x, we only accept security fixes; for 2.5.3, only bug
fixes (and a
Le Saturday 08 November 2008 00:07:33 Martin v. Löwis, vous avez écrit :
> Yes, my plan is to release 2.5.3 and 2.4.6 simultaneously.
> 2.4.6 will essentially contain everything that is on the
> branch today, unless somebody comes up with an urgent patch
> that also needs consideration.
Skip Mont
12 matches
Mail list logo
