s...@pobox.com wrote:
Martin> The mailing list python-3...@python.org is now closed. All
Martin> further discussion of Python 3.x takes place on
Martin> python-...@python.org.
Maybe set up a simple email alias reflecting python-3000 to python-dev?
It is currently mirrored to news.g
please unsubscribe me
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 00:20, Georg Brandl wrote:
> > Jeffrey Yasskin schrieb:
> >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Guido van Rossum
> wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Antoine Pitrou
> wrote:
> >>>
Barry Warsaw wrote:
Maybe set up a simple email alias reflecting python-3000 to python-dev?
Or,
https://launchpad.net/replybot
If we're going to leave something configured in Mailman, it already has an
auto-reply functionality. It would be nearly trivial to set that up.
--
Brad Knowles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 15, 2008, at 7:44 PM, s...@pobox.com wrote:
Martin> The mailing list python-3...@python.org is now closed. All
Martin> further discussion of Python 3.x takes place on
Martin> python-...@python.org.
Maybe set up a simple email alias
Martin> The mailing list python-3...@python.org is now closed. All
Martin> further discussion of Python 3.x takes place on
Martin> python-...@python.org.
Maybe set up a simple email alias reflecting python-3000 to python-dev?
Skip
___
Pytho
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Le Monday 15 December 2008 19:50:42 Josiah Carlson, vous avez écrit :
>> Would anyone mind terribly if I backported a version of:
>> http://bugs.python.org/issue4501 to 2.4 and 2.5?
>
> First the patch have be reviewed and at least applied t
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Aha! A specific file. I'm supportive of fixing that specific file. Now
> if you can figure out how to do it and still allow merging between 2.6
> and 3.0 that would be cool.
>
Here's the simplest solution I thought so far to allow smooth
> Aha! A specific file. I'm supportive of fixing that specific file. Now
> if you can figure out how to do it and still allow merging between 2.6
> and 3.0 that would be cool.
In the specific case, I think it's best to fix the 2.7 source, and then
merge the changes into 3k. The 3.x version is stil
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Aha! A specific file. I'm supportive of fixing that specific file. Now
> if you can figure out how to do it and still allow merging between 2.6
> and 3.0 that would be cool.
Like "svn blame", you can use "svn merge -x -w" to avoid merging
whitespace changes. However, svnm
> This particular thread of discussion does appear to be veering a little
> off topic though :)
And I apologize for starting it :-)
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
Steve Holden wrote:
> This is only significant because Martin is a perfectionist who wants to
> write better English. I can't remember a time when his
> slightly-less-than-perfect command of the language rendered anything he
> wrote incomprehensible.
I'd actually criticise the written communicatio
Le Monday 15 December 2008 19:50:42 Josiah Carlson, vous avez écrit :
> Would anyone mind terribly if I backported a version of:
> http://bugs.python.org/issue4501 to 2.4 and 2.5?
First the patch have be reviewed and at least applied to trunk :-)
Can you give an short example to describe the bug?
Jim Murphy wrote:
> Martin:
>
> You wrote:
>
> "That's not the issue. Had pymath.o been linked into python, it's
>symbols would have been exported (is that proper use of English
>tenses?)"
>
It does, however, make the common mistake of putting an apostrophe in a
possessive personal pro
> Would anyone mind terribly if I backported a version of:
> http://bugs.python.org/issue4501 to 2.4 and 2.5?
Yes, I would. These branches are frozen right now until the
final release is made. Afterwards, only security-critical patches
are allowed, which this one is not, AFAICT.
> It fixes some s
Martin:
You wrote:
"That's not the issue. Had pymath.o been linked into python, it's
symbols would have been exported (is that proper use of English
tenses?)"
Yes, it's a proper and idiomatic use of the subjunctive mood, which
many native (American) English speakers manage to mangle.
I
Aha! A specific file. I'm supportive of fixing that specific file. Now
if you can figure out how to do it and still allow merging between 2.6
and 3.0 that would be cool.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Alexandre Vassalotti
wrote:
> O
On 13-Dec-08, at 5:28 AM, Michael Foord wrote:
Lie Ryan wrote:
I'm sure probably most of you knows about psyco[1], the optimizer.
Python has an -O and -OO flag that is intended to be optimization
flag, but we know that currently it doesn't do much. Why not add
psyco as standard library an
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 00:20, Georg Brandl wrote:
> Jeffrey Yasskin schrieb:
>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Guido van Rossum python.org> writes:
>
> I think we should not do this. We should use
I have a patch that appears to fix this bug
http://bugs.python.org/file12361/urllib-chunked.diff
but I'm not sure about its interaction with the io module and
RawIOBase. Is there a new IO expert who could take a look at it for
me?
Jeremy
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
>
Would anyone mind terribly if I backported a version of:
http://bugs.python.org/issue4501 to 2.4 and 2.5?
It fixes some strange duplicate data issues on poll() with packets
with a nonstandard flag set.
- Josiah
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 2:55 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Christian Heimes wrote:
Miguel Lobo wrote:
>> I think we should not do this. We should use 4 space indents for new
>> files, but existing files should not be reindented. If you reindent,
>> much of the history of the file is essentially lost -- "svn blame"
>> will blame whoever reindented the code, and it's a pain to go b
On 2008-12-14 21:43, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> Personally, I think the indentation of, at least,
>> Objects/unicodeobject.c should be fixed. This file has become so
>> mixed-up with tab and space indents that I have no-idea what to use
>> when I edit it. Just to give an idea how messy it is, they a
Hi,
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
> There is currently a unit test in the trunk that fails in verbose mode:
>
> $ ./python.exe Lib/test/test_doctest.py -v
> ...
> UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position
> 338-339: ordinal not in range(128)
>
> Apparently, the problem is
On Friday 12 December 2008, Adam Olsen wrote:
> Only pages like this, which indicate the underlying API is an array of
> WCHAR:
>
> http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap/archive/2005/05/11/416552.aspx
Hmm, true. So even there, the encoding isn't known...
> char * is just fine. You need only pass a lengt
Jeffrey Yasskin schrieb:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>> Guido van Rossum python.org> writes:
I think we should not do this. We should use 4 space indents for new
files, but existing files sho
25 matches
Mail list logo
