[Python-Dev] Something like PEP-0304 - suppress *.pyc generation

2009-04-20 Thread christian . doll
Hello, im looking for something like PEP-0304 ( http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0304/) I need something to suppress the generation of *.pyc files because i have very much different machines which call a python program at same time. the python program crashes at different places and on differ

Re: [Python-Dev] Something like PEP-0304 - suppress *.pyc generation

2009-04-20 Thread İsmail Dönmez
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:54:15 pm christian.d...@basf.com wrote: > >> I need something to suppress the generation of *.pyc files >> because i have very much different machines which call a python >> program at same time. > > This list is for

Re: [Python-Dev] Something like PEP-0304 - suppress *.pyc generation

2009-04-20 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:54:15 pm christian.d...@basf.com wrote: > I need something to suppress the generation of *.pyc files > because i have very much different machines which call a python > program at same time. This list is for development *of* Python, not development *with* Python. You would

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-ideas] Proposed addtion to url lib.parse in 3.1 (and urlparse in 2.7)

2009-04-20 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Bill Janssen parc.com> writes: > > Sure. But nowhere does a spec say that this page charset should be used > in sending the values of a FORM using application/x-www-form-urlencoded > in a new HTTP request. It's just a convention some browsers use. Let's call it a de facto standard then. A beha

Re: [Python-Dev] #!/usr/bin/env python --> python3 where applicable

2009-04-20 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
Greg Ewing wrote: > Steven Bethard wrote: > >> That's an unfortunate decision. When the 2.X line stops being >> maintained (after 2.7 maybe?) we're going to be stuck with the "3" >> suffix forever for the "real" Python. > > I don't see why we have to be stuck with it forever. > When 2.x has faded

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-ideas] Proposed addtion to url lib.parse in 3.1 (and urlparse in 2.7)

2009-04-20 Thread Bill Janssen
Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Bill Janssen parc.com> writes: > > > > Sure. But nowhere does a spec say that this page charset should be used > > in sending the values of a FORM using application/x-www-form-urlencoded > > in a new HTTP request. It's just a convention some browsers use. > > Let's ca

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-ideas] Proposed addtion to url lib.parse in 3.1 (and urlparse in 2.7)

2009-04-20 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Bill Janssen parc.com> writes: > > Sure. And if HTTP was all about browsers keying off pages, that would > be fine with me. But it's not. HTTP is used in lots of places where > there are no browsers; I'm sorry, I don't follow you. The fact that something else than a browser makes the request

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-ideas] Proposed addtion to url lib.parse in 3.1 (and urlparse in 2.7)

2009-04-20 Thread Bill Janssen
Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Bill Janssen parc.com> writes: > > > > Sure. And if HTTP was all about browsers keying off pages, that would > > be fine with me. But it's not. HTTP is used in lots of places where > > there are no browsers; > > I'm sorry, I don't follow you. The fact that something

Re: [Python-Dev] #!/usr/bin/env python --> python3 where applicable

2009-04-20 Thread Jared Grubb
On 19 Apr 2009, at 02:17, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: Nick Coghlan writes: 3. Change the shebang lines in Python standard library scripts to be version specific and update release.py to fix them all when bumping the version number in the source tree. +1 I think that it's probably best to l

Re: [Python-Dev] #!/usr/bin/env python --> python3 where applicable

2009-04-20 Thread Michael Foord
Jared Grubb wrote: On 19 Apr 2009, at 02:17, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: Nick Coghlan writes: 3. Change the shebang lines in Python standard library scripts to be version specific and update release.py to fix them all when bumping the version number in the source tree. +1 I think that it's p

[Python-Dev] 3.1 beta blockers

2009-04-20 Thread Benjamin Peterson
The first (and only) beta of 3.1 is scheduled for less than 2 weeks away, May 2nd, and is creeping onto the horizon. There are currently 6 blockers: #5692: test_zipfile fails under Windows - This looks like a fairly easy fix. #5775: marshal.c needs to be checked for out of memory errors - Looks l

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 beta blockers

2009-04-20 Thread Benjamin Peterson
I forgot one: #4136 - Porting the json changes to py3k - This issue exposed the brokenness of the json module in py3k. Was any consensus reached about what the API of json should be? If the beta time rolls around and nothing has changed on this issue, I think Antoine's patch, which makes json inpu

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 beta blockers

2009-04-20 Thread Ned Deily
In article <1afaf6160904201509g2f5e784ah34c728732ca9b...@mail.gmail.com>, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > I forgot one: [...] What about #5756 - idle, pydoc, et al removed from 3.1? -- Ned Deily, n...@acm.org ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@pyt

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 beta blockers

2009-04-20 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Apr 20, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Ned Deily wrote: In article <1afaf6160904201509g2f5e784ah34c728732ca9b...@mail.gmail.com>, Benjamin Peterson wrote: I forgot one: [...] What about #5756 - idle, pydoc, et al removed from 3.1? Were we going to remove this from 2.7 also? I'm working on splitting

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 beta blockers

2009-04-20 Thread Ned Deily
In article <40d62762-abab-4de1-9be2-798e40ae2...@python.org>, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Apr 20, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Ned Deily wrote: > > > In article > > <1afaf6160904201509g2f5e784ah34c728732ca9b...@mail.gmail.com>, > > Benjamin Peterson wrote: > >> I forgot one: [...] > > > > What about #5756 -

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 beta blockers

2009-04-20 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2009/4/20 Barry Warsaw : > On Apr 20, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Ned Deily wrote: > >> In article >> <1afaf6160904201509g2f5e784ah34c728732ca9b...@mail.gmail.com>, >> Benjamin Peterson wrote: >>> >>> I forgot one: [...] >> >> What about #5756 - idle, pydoc, et al removed from 3.1? > > Were we going to remo

Re: [Python-Dev] 3.1 beta blockers

2009-04-20 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2009/4/20 Ned Deily : > In article > <1afaf6160904201509g2f5e784ah34c728732ca9b...@mail.gmail.com>, >  Benjamin Peterson wrote: >> I forgot one: [...] > > What about #5756 - idle, pydoc, et al removed from 3.1? I just bumped priority and left a comment. -- Regards, Benjamin __