>On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Peter Moody wrote:
> The pep has been updated with the excellent suggestions thus far.
>
> Are there any more?
Thanks for writing the PEP.
I tried a few of the common scenarios that I use at work. Disclaimer:
my comments are based on my work environment.
I was s
> x = compile("def foo():pass", "foo", "exec", _ast.PyCF_ONLY_AST)
>
> Does x contain real AST nodes or does it contain mirror structures
> (feel free to just tell me: don't be lazy, go read the code).
It only contains a mirror structure. See
pythonrun.c:Py_CompileStringFlags, and the (generated)
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Maybe this is something that differs by country, but I have *never*
heard the first address in an IP network (i.e. every bit not covered by
the netmask set to zero) referred to as anything other than the "network
address".
Ah! A change to interject a mostly pointless comme
The pep has been updated with the excellent suggestions thus far.
Are there any more?
Cheers,
/peter
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Peter Moody wrote:
> Howdy folks,
>
> I have a first draft of a PEP for including an IP address manipulation
> library in the python stdlib. It seems like there a
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 06:20, Frank Wierzbicki wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:00 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>> Now on to the complaints: Though I recently added support for this in
>>> Jython, I don't like that nodes can be defined without required
>>> attributes, for example:
>>>
>>> node
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der
Werven wrote:
> -On [20090818 22:15], Peter Moody (pe...@hda3.com) wrote:
>>I have a first draft of a PEP for including an IP address manipulation
>>library in the python stdlib. It seems like there are a lot of really
>>smart folks with some,
2009/8/14 Nick Coghlan :
> Georg Brandl wrote:
>> Nick Coghlan schrieb:
>>> P.S. For anyone else that is slow like me, take a close look at PEP 387...
>>
>> What should we see, other than that we have two PEPs on the same topic that
>> should be merged?
>
> Benjamin wrote the second one, so he obvi
2009/8/13 Christian Heimes :
> Steve Holden wrote:
>>
>> I sent fourteen requests for licenses in to Microsoft. I've asked them
>> to let me know which they grant (since they may choose to limit the
>> number) and will inform you all personally when I hear their decision.
>
> I've received my MSDN
-On [20090818 22:15], Peter Moody (pe...@hda3.com) wrote:
>I have a first draft of a PEP for including an IP address manipulation
>library in the python stdlib. It seems like there are a lot of really
>smart folks with some, ahem, strong ideas about what an IP address
>module should and shouldn't b
Peter Moody wrote:
> while not the the prettiest, you can already (ignoring the set_prefix)
> do something like:
>
newobject = ipaddr.IP(str(o.network) + "/new prefix")
>
> Is this sufficient?
At this point, that is probably fine. If it comes up often enough to be
worth providing a cleaner
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:00 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> Now on to the complaints: Though I recently added support for this in
>> Jython, I don't like that nodes can be defined without required
>> attributes, for example:
>>
>> node = ast.Assign()
>
> I think we disagree in two points in our ev
On 14.08.2009 10:02, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:23, Jan Matejek wrote:
Hello,
I'm cross-posting this to distributi...@freedesktop and python-dev,
because the topic is relevant to both groups and should be solved in
co
12 matches
Mail list logo
