Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com writes:
My other question is whether or not it would be worth having the logging
module able to export it's *current* configuration in dictionary form. I
don't have a use case other than that it might be useful for debugging
logging configuration errors when
According to http://docs.python.org/reference/datamodel.html , the
reflected operands functions like __radd__ are only called if the
left operand does not support the corresponding operation and the
operands are of different types. [3] For instance, to evaluate the
expression x - y, where y is an
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
According to http://docs.python.org/reference/datamodel.html , the
reflected operands functions like __radd__ are only called if the
left operand does not support the corresponding operation and the
operands are of
Hello,
In Objects/longobject.c, there's the SIGCHECK() macro which periodically checks
for signals when doing long integer computations (divisions, multiplications).
It does so by messing with the _Py_Ticker variable.
It was added in 1991 under the title Many small changes, and I suppose it was
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
In Objects/longobject.c, there's the SIGCHECK() macro which periodically
checks
for signals when doing long integer computations (divisions, multiplications).
It does so by messing with the _Py_Ticker variable.
It
Mark Dickinson dickinsm at gmail.com writes:
Yes, I suspect there are. Though you don't need millions of digits for a
single
operation to take a noticeable amount of time: try str(10**10),
for example.
Is there a benefit to removing the check?
Apart from casual cleanup, the reason
I see the same behaviour, moreover when I change class Quantity to a classic
class (removing '(object)'), it works as expected. (i.e. Quanitity.__add__()
is called after the fourth print. I run Python 2.6.2 on Vista.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Can we remove this check, or are there people doing million-digits
calculations
they want to interrupt using Control-C ?
I sometimes do million-digits calculations that I want to interrupt using
Control-C.
Daniel Stutzbach daniel at stutzbachenterprises.com writes:
I sometimes do million-digits calculations that I want to interrupt using
Control-C.(particularly when I didn't *intend* to do a million-digits
calculation... ;) )--
Sure, but it's no different than doing, e.g.:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Daniel Stutzbach daniel at stutzbachenterprises.com writes:
I sometimes do million-digits calculations that I want to interrupt using
Control-C.(particularly when I didn't *intend* to do a million-digits
Ehsan Amiri wrote:
I see the same behaviour, moreover when I change class Quantity to a
classic class (removing '(object)'), it works as expected. (i.e.
Quanitity.__add__() is called after the fourth print. I run Python 2.6.2
on Vista.
Darren found the explanation further down the page he was
Hello everyone.
The source tarballs and Windows installers for Python 2.6.4rc2 are now
available:
http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.6.4/
Please download them, install them, and try to use them with your
projects and environments. Let's make 2.6.4 a rock solid release! If
there
12 matches
Mail list logo
