On 3 Oct 2010, at 02:35, Nir Soffer wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 1:36 AM, James Y Knight f...@fuhm.net wrote:
An OSX code sketch is available here (summary: call FSPathMakeRef
to get an
FSRef from a path string, then FSRefMakePath to make it back into a
path,
which will then have the
On Oct 3, 2010, at 9:18 AM, Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen wrote:
A simpler alternative would probably be the F_GETPATH fcntl. An example:
That requires that you have permission to open the file (and to actually do so
which might have other effects), while the File Manager's FSRef method
I'm trying to write a little program that uses the full text search extension
module for sqlite with Python 2.7 on Snow Leopard. I installed Python by
downloading the DMG file from python.org. According to the Python docs
On Oct 3, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I'm trying to write a little program that uses the full text search extension
module for sqlite with Python 2.7 on Snow Leopard. I installed Python by
downloading the DMG file from python.org. According to the Python docs
Modified: tracker/instances/python-dev/config.ini.template
+[django]
+# generate on a per-instance basis
+secret_key = 'e...@4s$*(idwm5-87teftxlksckmy8$tyo7(tm!n-5x)zeuheex'
I assume the secrecy of this is rather irrelevant?
It's only the template. In the instance, you have to replace it with
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.dewrote:
I'll have to come up with a better way to determine the branch
which a patch was created on.
That would also be helpful for those of us using DVCS software to talk to
the svn server. :-)
--
Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D.
Thanks Martin, this is really good.
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Patches are skipped if:
* they have been added to Rietveld already
* they have no clear base version (i.e. they don't originate
from svn diff)
* they belong to no or a closed
Hello,
I have a proposal of making the range() function inclusive; that is,
range(3) would generate 0, 1, 2, and 3, as opposed to 0, 1, and 2. Not only
is it more intuitive, it also seems to be used often, with coders often
writing range(0, example+1) to get the intended result. It would be easy
2010/10/3 Eviatar Bach eviatarb...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I have a proposal
See the python-ideas mailing list.
of making the range() function inclusive; that is,
range(3) would generate 0, 1, 2, and 3, as opposed to 0, 1, and 2. Not only
is it more intuitive, it also seems to be used often,
On 03Oct2010 20:04, Eviatar Bach eviatarb...@gmail.com wrote:
| I have a proposal of making the range() function inclusive; that is,
| range(3) would generate 0, 1, 2, and 3, as opposed to 0, 1, and 2. Not only
| is it more intuitive, it also seems to be used often, with coders often
| writing
10 matches
Mail list logo
