Am 08.11.2010 01:13, schrieb "Martin v. Löwis":
>> I've spent a good bit of time on that, and left all the instructions in
>> the buildbot master config. I also adapted buildbot's hg hook to our
>> situation (e.g. to send a change to multiple masters, as required for
>> the community buildbots), s
Qi Yong writes:
> Hello,
>
> With this script, after ctrl-d, ctrl-c exception not catch.
> Is it a python bug or a wrong exception usage? Thanks.
> If with import readline, this problem disappears.
there's already a bug in the issue tracker: http://bugs.python.org/issue1195
Cheers,
- Ralf
_
Qi Yong writes:
> With this script, after ctrl-d, ctrl-c exception not catch.
When I run it, the Ctrl-D doesn't affect the behaviour of Ctrl-C. Can
you confirm that the behaviour is dependent on whether Ctrl-D is used?
> If with import readline, this problem disappears.
Again, if I ‘import rea
On 11/7/2010 9:58 PM, C. Titus Brown wrote:
> Yes, yes, I agree that some graciousness is a good idea.
>
> Oh, wait... you're not helping.
Classy.
I don't remember being invited to help. snakebite.org is a dead end.
snakebite-list hasn't had a post for over a year. Where is the list of
things th
On 11/7/2010 5:11 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:03:53 +0100 (CET)
eric.araujo wrote:
Author: eric.araujo
Date: Sat Nov 6 19:03:52 2010
New Revision: 86276
Log:
Fix #10252 again (hopefully definitely). Patch by Brian Curtin.
It seems this and previous fixes should be back
Hello,
With this script, after ctrl-d, ctrl-c exception not catch.
Is it a python bug or a wrong exception usage? Thanks.
If with import readline, this problem disappears.
-- qiyong
def parse():
try:
answer = raw_input("Eo: ")
print answer
except
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 09:32:33PM -0500, Scott Dial wrote:
> On 11/7/2010 7:09 PM, Martin v. L?wis wrote:
> >> Luckily, the problems that we faced 2.5 years ago when I came up with
> >> the idea of Snakebite are still just as ever present today ;-)
> >
> > Is this bashing of existing infrastructu
On Monday 08 November 2010 00:34:36 David Bolen wrote:
> Victor Stinner writes:
> > You wrote that the "POSIX" semaphore are very limited. Do it mean that
> > there is another kind of semaphore will an higher limit?
>
> Well, I think the SYSV semaphores are either less limited or at least
> more
On 11/7/2010 7:09 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> Luckily, the problems that we faced 2.5 years ago when I came up with
>> the idea of Snakebite are still just as ever present today ;-)
>
> Is this bashing of existing infrastructure really necessary?
> People (like me) might start bashing about vapo
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 06:24:59 -0500
Trent Nelson wrote:
> (And if we feel like bringing IRIX/MIPS
> and Tru64/Alphas back as primary platforms, we've got the hardware to do
> that, too ;-).)
Unless you want to rename your project zombiebite, it would probably be
better not to resurrect those old
> I've spent a good bit of time on that, and left all the instructions in
> the buildbot master config. I also adapted buildbot's hg hook to our
> situation (e.g. to send a change to multiple masters, as required for
> the community buildbots), so it should be quite easy to actually
> switch the b
> Luckily, the problems that we faced 2.5 years ago when I came up with
> the idea of Snakebite are still just as ever present today ;-)
Is this bashing of existing infrastructure really necessary?
People (like me) might start bashing about vaporware and how
a bird in the hand is worth two in the
Victor Stinner writes:
> You wrote that the "POSIX" semaphore are very limited. Do it mean that there
> is another kind of semaphore will an higher limit?
Well, I think the SYSV semaphores are either less limited or at least
more adjustable. They've certainly been around longer in FreeBSD.
The
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 19:03:53 +0100 (CET)
eric.araujo wrote:
> Author: eric.araujo
> Date: Sat Nov 6 19:03:52 2010
> New Revision: 86276
>
> Log:
> Fix #10252 again (hopefully definitely). Patch by Brian Curtin.
It seems this and previous fixes should be backported to 2.7.
Regards
Antoine.
Am 07.11.2010 22:05, schrieb MRAB:
> It looks like the bug tracker is down.
Thanks - we have already contacted the hosting company, who have already
contacted the datacenter. It appears that the bug tracker actually
wasn't down (at least, it believes it was up all time), which suggests
that there
Am 07.11.2010 15:57, schrieb James Y Knight:
> On Nov 6, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> So I don't recall a decision that there shouldn't be a python2
>> binary,
>
> The decision to make one would have to be an active decision, since
> Python has never installed one before. If there
It looks like the bug tracker is down.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 09:30:17 -0800, Bobby Impollonia wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Valery Khamenya wrote:
> >> Can you post your patch on bugs.python.org?
> >
> > the site is not working currently.
>
> Yes, it is down for me too, trying from multiple hosts. It was up
> approximately a
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Valery Khamenya wrote:
>> Can you post your patch on bugs.python.org?
>
> the site is not working currently.
Yes, it is down for me too, trying from multiple hosts. It was up
approximately an hour ago, but has now been unresponsive for the past
twenty or thirty mi
>
> Can you post your patch on bugs.python.org?
>
the site is not working currently.
Also, I have forgotten to mention, that the usual lines in .pythonstartup
should look now like that:
# the usual lines:
import readline
import rlcompleter
readline.parse_and_bind('tab: complete')
readline.parse
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 04:19, Valery Khamenya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A) I missed the auto-complete feature for dictionary keys a lot in python
> console. This patch seems to do the job.
>
> B) There is no rlcompleter tests in trunk for some reason. So, I've taken
> the 2.7.x test_rlcompleter.py and ext
On 11:24 am, tr...@snakebite.org wrote:
2. Address the second problem of the buildbot web interface sucking
for non-standard branches. I'm thinking along the lines of a hack to
buildbot, such that upon creation of new per-activity branches off a
mainline, something magically runs in the bac
On Nov 6, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> So I don't recall a decision that there shouldn't be a python2
> binary,
The decision to make one would have to be an active decision, since Python has
never installed one before. If there should be one, then the Python Makefile
should make on
Am 07.11.2010 12:50, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Trent Nelson wrote:
>> 1. Set up standard build slaves on all the platforms, but put something in
>> place that allowed committers to ssh/mstsc in to said slaves when things go
>> wrong in order to aid with debugging and
Hi,
A) I missed the auto-complete feature for dictionary keys a lot in python
console. This patch seems to do the job.
B) There is no rlcompleter tests in trunk for some reason. So, I've taken
the 2.7.x test_rlcompleter.py and extended it.
C) patched rlcompleter as such works OK for unicode dict
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 09:01:22 +0100
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>
> > If I were going to maintain 2.7
> > for several years, I would want to have the benefit of gradual
> > improvements that make maintainance easier.
>
> I question whether cleanup on a maintenance branch makes maintenance
> easier.
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:24, Trent Nelson wrote:
> Titus, for example, alluded to some nifty way for a committer to push his
> local hg branch/changes somewhere, such that it would kick off builds on
> multiple platforms in the same sorta' vein as point 2, but able to leverage
> cloud resources l
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Trent Nelson wrote:
> 1. Set up standard build slaves on all the platforms, but put something in
> place that allowed committers to ssh/mstsc in to said slaves when things go
> wrong in order to aid with debugging and/or maintaining general buildbot
> health (OK'in
On 07-Nov-10 1:55 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 3:53 AM, Giampaolo Rodolà wrote:
In such cases I would find more easy to be able to connect to the
machine and test myself rather than create a separate branch, commit,
schedule a buildbot run, wait for it to complete and see whet
>> It's rather a matter of agreeing when moving forward: IMO, mere style
>> changes, code cleanup etc shouldn't be applied to the bug fix branches,
>> as their only purpose is to provide bug fixes for existing users.
>
> The omission of the deletion from the 5/5 revision was a bug in that
> revisi
30 matches
Mail list logo
