Neil Schemenauer n...@python.ca writes:
Regarding collapsing multiple comments (and rewriting history in
general), I feel there are two main schools of thought. One school
considers the development history of a change important and that it
should be preserved: every step and misstep of
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Daniel Stutzbach stutzb...@google.com
wrote:
Is there a good use-case for the func argument?
The examples that Raymond gives in the docs (cumulative
multiplication, running min/max,
On Mar 28, 2011, at 12:38 AM, Daniel Stutzbach wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Daniel Stutzbach stutzb...@google.com
wrote:
Is there a good use-case for the func argument?
The examples that Raymond gives
On 27 March 2011 20:15, Neil Schemenauer n...@python.ca wrote:
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
What is rebase? Why does everyone want it and hate it at the same time?
[...]
The other school, which I am a member of, considers a logical
development sequence more important than actual
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
For people in the clean history school, I'd recommend looking at mq
for your personal use. But it's definitely an advanced feature of
Mercurial, so it may be better to understand core Mercurial (and at
least temporarily
On 28 March 2011 11:35, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
For people in the clean history school, I'd recommend looking at mq
for your personal use. But it's definitely an advanced feature of
Mercurial, so it may be
On 28/03/2011 11:35, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Paul Moorep.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
For people in the clean history school, I'd recommend looking at mq
for your personal use. But it's definitely an advanced feature of
Mercurial, so it may be better to understand core
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Michael Foord
fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
On 28/03/2011 11:35, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Mercurial makes merging easy enough that I'm happy with the way that
approach is working so far.
For any non-trivial work I think this is the best approach. You still get
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Darren Dale dsdal...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggested at python-ideas a way that the declaration of abstract
properties could be improved to support the decorator syntax:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2011-March/009411.html .
A relatively small
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:07:08 -0400 (EDT)
David E. Cross cro...@cs.rpi.edu wrote:
Trying to compile and install Python 2.7 on irix 6.5.22 IP22 (N32 ABI
model), Using gcc-4.5.1 and binutils 2.20.1. Everything goes well (I
applied th patches listed at:
On Mar 27, 2011, at 01:39 PM, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
I'm asking because I don't know hg and git well enough to answer the
question. In my own use of Bazaar over the last 4+ years, I've almost never
rebased or even been asked to.
Maybe it depends on what
On 28.03.2011 09:49, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
On Mar 28, 2011, at 12:38 AM, Daniel Stutzbach wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Daniel Stutzbach stutzb...@google.com
Greetings!
I'm not sure where the best place is to ask this question, so I'll start
here -- feel free to redirect me if necessary.
I would like to have some software to keep track of bugs, to-do's,
ideas, etc., etc. -- you know, an issue tracker! Naturally I thought of
the one we use to
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 15:05, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Greetings!
I'm not sure where the best place is to ask this question, so I'll start
here -- feel free to redirect me if necessary.
I would like to have some software to keep track of bugs, to-do's, ideas,
etc., etc. --
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:14:20 -0500
Brian Curtin brian.cur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 15:05, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Greetings!
I'm not sure where the best place is to ask this question, so I'll start
here -- feel free to redirect me if necessary.
I
Brian Curtin wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 15:05, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us
mailto:et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Greetings!
I'm not sure where the best place is to ask this question, so I'll
start here -- feel free to redirect me if necessary.
I would like to have some
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:14:20 -0500
Brian Curtin brian.cur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 15:05, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
I would like to have some software to keep track of bugs, to-do's, ideas,
etc., etc. -- you know, an issue tracker!
On 3/28/2011 6:13 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
This philosophy is essentially what the mq extension to Mercurial
tries to capture. In mq, you maintain a series of patches on top of
your repository, amending, refining and rebasing them as you wish
until they are ready to commit, at which time you take
On 28 March 2011 22:29, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
From what you write, it seems that mq is actually an unordered patch set,
not a queue (in the FIFO) sense. (Or do you have to commit and remove in
FIFO order?) Why the confusing mislabel, if indeed I understood correctly?
It's a queue
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Raymond Hettinger
raymond.hettin...@gmail.com wrote:
Do a google code search for R's builtin functions cumsum, cumprod, cummin,
and cummax. Look at mumpy's accumulate ufunc which works with many
operators. APL and K also have an accumulate tool which takes
Michael Foord fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk writes:
On 28/03/2011 11:35, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I'm seeing if I can get the best of both worlds by having a public
sandbox repo where I work on things (which has the full messy
history of development on its feature branches), and then just drop
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:31:12 +0200, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:14:20 -0500
Brian Curtin brian.cur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 15:05, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
I would like to have some software to keep track of bugs,
22 matches
Mail list logo
