Terry Reedy wrote:
On 5/24/2011 12:06 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Le mardi 24 mai 2011 à 11:27 -0400, Terry Reedy a écrit :
+.. function:: RAND_bytes(num)
+
+ Returns *num* cryptographically strong pseudo-random bytes.
+
+ .. versionadded:: 3.3
+
+.. function:: RAND_pseudo_bytes(num)
Hi all,
before opening an issue to track the request, I'd like to ask advice
here about this: extend os.chown() to accept even user/group names
instead of just uid and gid.
On a Unix system, you can call chown command passing either id or
names, so it seems (to me at least) natural to expect
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 15:13 +1000, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:09 PM, solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
results for 234021dcad93 on branch default
test_packaging leaked [128, 128, 128] references, sum=384
Is there a new
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 15:09 +1000, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
The RAND_bytes() documentation should probably make it clearer that
unlike the random module and RAND_pseudo_bytes(), RAND_bytes() can
*fail* (by raising SSLError) if it isn't in a position to provide the
requested random data.
Walter Dörwald wrote:
On 24.05.11 12:58, Victor Stinner wrote:
Le mardi 24 mai 2011 à 12:42 +0200, Łukasz Langa a écrit :
Wiadomość napisana przez Walter Dörwald w dniu 2011-05-24, o godz. 12:16:
I don't see which usecase is not covered by TextIOWrapper. But I know
some cases which are not
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 08:59 +0300, Petri Lehtinen a écrit :
So it seems to me that RAND_bytes() either returns cryptographically
strong data or fails (is it possible to detect the failure with the
Python function? Should this be documented?).
RAND_bytes() raises an SSLError on error. You
Victor Stinner wrote:
I already patched the doc of the random module to add a security
warning. Well, you don't really need to know how a CSPRNG is
implemented, just that random cannot be used for security and that
ssl.RAND_bytes() raises an error if was seeded with enough data.
Tell me if
Victor Stinner wrote:
I already patched the doc of the random module to add a security
warning. Well, you don't really need to know how a CSPRNG is
implemented, just that random cannot be used for security and that
ssl.RAND_bytes() raises an error if was seeded with enough data.
Tell me if
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 11:38 +0200, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
You are missing the point: we have StreamReader and StreamWriter APIs
on codecs to allow each codecs to implement more efficient ways of
encoding and decoding streams.
Examples of such optimizations are reading the stream in
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 15:13 +1000, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:09 PM, solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
results for 234021dcad93 on branch default
On 05/25/2011 06:58 AM, Petri Lehtinen wrote:
Eric Smith wrote:
Victor Stinner wrote:
I already patched the doc of the random module to add a security
warning. Well, you don't really need to know how a CSPRNG is
implemented, just that random cannot be used for security and that
On May 25, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
before opening an issue to track the request, I'd like to ask advice
here about this: extend os.chown() to accept even user/group names
instead of just uid and gid.
On a Unix system, you can call chown command passing either id or
names, so it
Victor Stinner wrote:
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 11:38 +0200, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
You are missing the point: we have StreamReader and StreamWriter APIs
on codecs to allow each codecs to implement more efficient ways of
encoding and decoding streams.
Examples of such optimizations are
On Wed, 25 May 2011 09:41:46 -0400
Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On May 25, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
before opening an issue to track the request, I'd like to ask advice
here about this: extend os.chown() to accept even user/group names
instead of just uid and gid.
On
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 15:41, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
I think it would be a nice feature, and I can see the conflict. OT1H you want
to keep os.chown() a thin wrapper, but OTOH you'd rather not have to add a
new, arguably more difficult to discover, function. Given those two
On May 25, 2011, at 04:15 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
Right. Please add a mention of shutil.chown() to the os.chown() docs, though.
Brilliant!
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 15:43 +0200, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
For UTF-16 it would e.g. make sense to always read data in blocks
with even sizes, removing the trial-and-error decoding and extra
buffering currently done by the base classes. For UTF-32, the
blocks should have size % 4 == 0.
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 13:10 +0200, Victor Stinner a écrit :
codecs is always faster (between 1.07 and 1.15 times faster than io) to
read the whole content of file using read(-1). Something should maybe be
optimized in TextIOWrapper.read() ;-)
Oh, I understood: it's maybe the universal
While we're at it, adding a recursive argument to this shutil.chown
could also be useful.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
On Wed, 25 May 2011 18:26:46 +0200
senthil.kumaran python-check...@python.org wrote:
A new method called service_action is made available in BaseServer, called by
serve_forever loop. This useful in cases where Mixins can use it for cleanup
action. ForkingMixin class uses service_action to
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 18:46 +0200, Charles-François Natali a écrit :
While we're at it, adding a recursive argument to this shutil.chown
could also be useful.
I don't like the idea of a recursive flag. I would prefer a map-like
function to apply a function on all files of a directory.
On 5/25/2011 1:17 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 18:46 +0200, Charles-François Natali a écrit :
While we're at it, adding a recursive argument to this shutil.chown
could also be useful.
I don't like the idea of a recursive flag. I would prefer a map-like
function to
Victor Stinner wrote:
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 18:46 +0200, Charles-François Natali a écrit :
While we're at it, adding a recursive argument to this shutil.chown
could also be useful.
I don't like the idea of a recursive flag. I would prefer a map-like
function to apply a function on all
On 26/03/2011 00:33, Laurens Van Houtven wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Thomas Wouters tho...@python.org
mailto:tho...@python.org wrote:
It ended up that Jim Fulton is actually writing the PEP (with
input from Twisted people and others.)
--
Thomas Wouters
While we're at it, adding a recursive argument to this shutil.chown
could also be useful.
I don't like the idea of a recursive flag. I would prefer a map-like
function to apply a function on all files of a directory. Something
like shutil.apply_recursive(shutil.chown)...
I was also
A new method called service_action is made available in BaseServer, called by
serve_forever loop. This useful in cases where Mixins can use it for cleanup
action. ForkingMixin class uses service_action to collect the zombie child
processes. Initial Patch by Justin Wark.
Is it reasonable,
This just in from pypy-dev. I am reposting it here because I
am fairly certain that nobody on the pypy-dev mailing list
uses the multibytecodex, but there has got to be at least one
person here who does.
Please reply to the pypy-dev article, not here, or mail to pypy-...@python.org
if you are
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 23:41 +0200, Laura Creighton a écrit :
One reason I didn't implement the classes yet is that I couldn't
understand two points in how they are supposed to work. But it seems
that there are really two bugs, as I've been pointed to:
http://bugs.python.org/issue12100 and
2011/5/26 Victor Stinner victor.stin...@haypocalc.com
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 18:46 +0200, Charles-François Natali a écrit :
While we're at it, adding a recursive argument to this shutil.chown
could also be useful.
I don't like the idea of a recursive flag. I would prefer a map-like
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
A new method called service_action is made available in BaseServer, called
by
serve_forever loop. This useful in cases where Mixins can use it for
cleanup
action. ForkingMixin class uses service_action to collect the zombie child
processes. Initial Patch by
30 matches
Mail list logo
