Victor Stinner wrote:
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 15:43 +0200, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
For UTF-16 it would e.g. make sense to always read data in blocks
with even sizes, removing the trial-and-error decoding and extra
buffering currently done by the base classes. For UTF-32, the
blocks should
So, given the discussions about this change, can you please revert it,
Victor?
Eric.
On 05/26/2011 08:07 AM, victor.stinner wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7ba176c2f558
changeset: 70397:7ba176c2f558
user:Victor Stinner victor.stin...@haypocalc.com
date:Thu May 26
Le vendredi 27 mai 2011 10:17:29, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
I think that the readahead algorithm is much more faster than trying to
avoid partial input, and it's not a problem to have partial input if you
use an incremental decoder.
Depends on where you're coming from. For non-seekable
2011/5/27 Victor Stinner victor.stin...@haypocalc.com:
You have until the release of Python 3.3 to prove that StreamReader and/or
StreamWriter can be faster than TextIOWrapper. If you can prove it using a
patch and a benchmark, I will be ok to revert my commit.
Please don't hold commits over
Victor Stinner wrote:
Le vendredi 27 mai 2011 10:17:29, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
I am still -1 on deprecating the StreamReader/Writer parts of
the codec APIs. I've given numerous reasons on why these are
useful, what their intention is, why they were added to Python 1.6.
codecs.open() now
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:42 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Wrong order: first write a PEP, then discuss, then get approval,
then patch.
Indeed.
If another committer says please revert and better justify this
change then we revert it. We don't get into commit wars.
Something does
Le vendredi 27 mai 2011 15:33:07, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
2011/5/27 Victor Stinner victor.stin...@haypocalc.com:
You have until the release of Python 3.3 to prove that StreamReader
and/or StreamWriter can be faster than TextIOWrapper. If you can prove
it using a patch and a benchmark, I
2011/5/27 Victor Stinner victor.stin...@haypocalc.com:
Le vendredi 27 mai 2011 15:33:07, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
2011/5/27 Victor Stinner victor.stin...@haypocalc.com:
You have until the release of Python 3.3 to prove that StreamReader
and/or StreamWriter can be faster than
Le vendredi 27 mai 2011 16:01:14, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:42 PM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
Wrong order: first write a PEP, then discuss, then get approval,
then patch.
Indeed.
If another committer says please revert and better justify this
change
Le vendredi 27 mai 2011 15:42:10, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
If we'd go by your reasoning for deprecating and eventually
removing parts of the stdlib or Python's subsystems, we'll end
up with a barebone version of Python. That's not what we want
and it's not what our users want.
I don't want to
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2011-05-20 - 2011-05-27)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open2813 (+19)
closed 21165 (+50)
total 23978 (+69)
Open issues
Victor Stinner wrote:
Le vendredi 27 mai 2011 15:42:10, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit :
If we'd go by your reasoning for deprecating and eventually
removing parts of the stdlib or Python's subsystems, we'll end
up with a barebone version of Python. That's not what we want
and it's not what our users
On behalf of the Python development team and the Python community, I'm
happy to announce the release of Python 2.5.6. There were no changes
since the release candidate.
This is a source-only release that only includes security fixes. The
last full bug-fix release of Python 2.5 was Python 2.5.4.
On 5/27/2011 11:08 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Tell me if I am wrong, but only Marc-Andre is against deprecating StreamReader
While I am, in general, in favor of removing some duplication, I was and
am against doing this change precipitously. So I was for the reversion
(noted), at least
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 5/27/2011 11:08 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Tell me if I am wrong, but only Marc-Andre is against deprecating
StreamReader
While I am, in general, in favor of removing some duplication, I was and am
against doing this
15 matches
Mail list logo
