[Python-Dev] Windows download links not working for 2.7.2rc1 and 3.1.4rc1

2011-06-02 Thread Michael Foord
Hey all, The links to the Windows downloads for 2.7.2rc1 and 3.1.4rc1 are 404. (From the release pages.) http://python.org/ftp/python/3.1.3/python-3.1.4rc1.msi http://python.org/ftp/python/2.7.1/python-2.7.2rc1.msi All the best, Michael Foord -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: The compiler class for EMX was removed

2011-06-02 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:47 AM, eric.araujo python-check...@python.org wrote: http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/c3f8991cd74d changeset:   70587:c3f8991cd74d user:        Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org date:        Wed Jun 01 15:20:44 2011 +0200 summary:  The compiler class for EMX was removed

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: The compiler class for EMX was removed

2011-06-02 Thread Éric Araujo
Le 02/06/2011 15:56, Nick Coghlan a écrit : On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:47 AM, eric.araujo python-check...@python.org wrote: The compiler class for EMX was removed This is the kind of checkin comment where the phrasing is a little confusing. Yep. Next time I’ll be longer and use something

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Add rules for indenting continuation lines.

2011-06-02 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 02, 2011, at 08:09 PM, guido.van.rossum wrote: +Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically using +Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets and braces, +or using a hanging indent of double your code indention, in which case +there

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Add rules for indenting continuation lines.

2011-06-02 Thread Glenn Linderman
On 6/2/2011 11:19 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: On Jun 02, 2011, at 08:09 PM, guido.van.rossum wrote: +Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically using +Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets and braces, +or using a hanging indent of double

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Add rules for indenting continuation lines.

2011-06-02 Thread Guido van Rossum
Bingo. That's why. (Though you are missing some colons in your examples. :-) --Guido On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com wrote: On 6/2/2011 11:19 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: On Jun 02, 2011, at 08:09 PM, guido.van.rossum wrote: +Continuation lines should

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Add rules for indenting continuation lines.

2011-06-02 Thread R. David Murray
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:19:00 -0400, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote: On Jun 02, 2011, at 08:09 PM, guido.van.rossum wrote: +Yes: # Aligned with opening delimiter + foo = long_function_name(var_one, var_two, + var_three, var_four) + +

Re: [Python-Dev] Windows download links not working for 2.7.2rc1 and 3.1.4rc1

2011-06-02 Thread Martin v. Löwis
The links to the Windows downloads for 2.7.2rc1 and 3.1.4rc1 are 404. (From the release pages.) Thanks, fixed. Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe:

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Add rules for indenting continuation lines.

2011-06-02 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 02, 2011, at 03:07 PM, R. David Murray wrote: Personally, I use enough indentation. Sometimes that is a single indentation level, but sometimes it is more. Two spaces is definitely right out, though :) The place where a single indentation level is *not* enough is when the line being

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Add rules for indenting continuation lines.

2011-06-02 Thread Glenn Linderman
On 6/2/2011 12:01 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: Bingo. That's why. (Though you are missing some colons in your examples.:-) --Guido You operate as a good Python compiler :) ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Add rules for indenting continuation lines.

2011-06-02 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 02, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Glenn Linderman wrote: On 6/2/2011 12:01 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: Bingo. That's why. (Though you are missing some colons in your examples.:-) --Guido You operate as a good Python compiler :) Actually, this is a key insight, which I just mentioned in a private

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Add rules for indenting continuation lines.

2011-06-02 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote: On Jun 02, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Glenn Linderman wrote: On 6/2/2011 12:01 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: Bingo. That's why. (Though you are missing some colons in your examples.:-) --Guido You operate as a good Python compiler :)

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Add rules for indenting continuation lines.

2011-06-02 Thread Glenn Linderman
On 6/2/2011 3:49 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: Except that the rule gets more complicated. I don't think that always using the double indent is going to mean a lot more line breaks, so I don't think there's much benefit to the added complication. Further, tools like python-mode would have to go

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Add rules for indenting continuation lines.

2011-06-02 Thread Greg Ewing
Guido van Rossum wrote: Bingo. That's why. (Though you are missing some colons in your examples. :-) --Guido On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com wrote: One place a double indent is extremely nice is for lines that initiate a new indentation, but are

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Add rules for indenting continuation lines.

2011-06-02 Thread Glenn Linderman
On 6/2/2011 3:18 PM, Greg Ewing wrote: i.e. indent the *body* one more place. This avoids the jarriness of seeing an outdent that doesn't correspond to the closing of a suite. -1. There are likely many more lines in the suite than in the conditional, that, by being double indented, would

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Add rules for indenting continuation lines.

2011-06-02 Thread Ben Finney
Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz writes: Another way to approach that is if some_function( Some, Parameters, To, Pass, ): If_True_Operations() i.e. indent the *body* one more place. This avoids the jarriness of seeing an outdent that doesn't