On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 00:15, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jun 02, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Glenn Linderman wrote:
>
>>On 6/2/2011 12:01 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>> Bingo. That's why. (Though you are missing some colons in your examples.:-)
>>>
>>> --Guido
>>
>>You operate as a good Python compiler :)
>
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2011-05-27 - 2011-06-03)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open2815 ( +2)
closed 21221 (+56)
total 24036 (+58)
Open issues wit
With regards to http://bugs.python.org/issue11457
What should the name of the (seconds, nanoseconds) tuple be?
st_atim, st_ctim and st_mtim has bee suggested and is what the POSIX
specification uses. This is confusingly similar to the existing
st_atime, st_ctime and st_mtime.
Also, should it be t
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> ..
> What should the name of the (seconds, nanoseconds) tuple be?
> st_atim, st_ctim and st_mtim has bee suggested and is what the POSIX
> specification uses. This is confusingly similar to the existing
> st_atime, st_ctime and st_mtime.
>
S
On Jun 3, 2011, at 10:27 AM, eric.araujo wrote:
>
> Fix reST label for collections ABCs.
>
> The previous markup hijacked the abstract-base-classes glossary entry,
> which resulted in the HTML linking to collections.abc when defining the
> generic ABC concept. Now the glossary links to the abc
Le 03/06/2011 19:43, Raymond Hettinger a écrit :
> I think the users are better served by links to collections.abc, io.abc, etc.
The specific problem I addressed was that :ref:`abstract-base-classes`
was replaced by “Collections Abstract Base Classes”, which was wrong:
the glossary entry talks abo
> What should the name of the (seconds, nanoseconds) tuple be?
See my comment: -1 on having such a tuple in the first place.
We have the decimal type to represent arbitrary-precision time stamps.
> st_atim, st_ctim and st_mtim has bee suggested and is what the POSIX
> specification uses. This is
> I followed up on the tracker. I'm +0 on adding this to 2.6, but not until
> after the 2.6.7 release on Friday.
>
> How well has this change been tested? Are there people for whom this could
> break things?
As others have pointed out: it would break systems that don't have the
_ssl module buil
Le vendredi 03 juin 2011 17:28:48, eric.araujo a écrit :
> +packaging
> +-
> +
> +:mod:`distutils` has undergone additions and refactoring under a new name,
> +:mod:`packaging`, to allow developers to break backward compatibility.
> +:mod:`distutils` is still provided in the standard librar
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:40 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> I followed up on the tracker. I'm +0 on adding this to 2.6, but not until
>> after the 2.6.7 release on Friday.
>>
>> How well has this change been tested? Are there people for whom this could
>> break things?
>
> As others have pointe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2011 06:06 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Le vendredi 03 juin 2011 17:28:48, eric.araujo a écrit :
>> +packaging
>> +-
>> +
>> +:mod:`distutils` has undergone additions and refactoring under a new name,
>> +:mod:`packaging`, to allow deve
Hello Pythoneers and Pythonistas,
I'm happy to announce the final release of Python 2.6.7.
Python 2.6 is in security-fix only mode. This means that general bug
maintenance has ended, and only critical security issues are being fixed.
We will support Python 2.6 in security-fix only mode until Oct
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> > Even for Python 2.4, really? Do you really need to support this old
> Python
>
>
> Yes. Many projects distribute packages to folks still using 2.4.
>
Supporting detail: I recently installed the latest CentOS, 5.6, and found
that it still Sh
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> Supporting detail: I recently installed the latest CentOS, 5.6, and found
> that it still Ships with CPython 2.4.
>
> I installed a CPython 3.2 in /usr/local almost immediately, but I can see
> how some might want 2.4 support yet.
Yeah, this
14 matches
Mail list logo
