In article ,
Ned Deily wrote:
> In article <20121002073135.ga26...@sleipnir.bytereef.org>,
> Stefan Krah wrote:
> > Ned Deily wrote:
> > > > Forgot the link...
> > > > http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7885
> > > > On Monday, October 1, 2012, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> >
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Chris Jerdonek writes:
>
> > You can create multiple files this way. I just verified it. But the
> > problem happens with merging. You will create merge conflicts in the
> > deleted portions of every split file on every merge. The
On 10/5/2012 9:01 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 10/05/2012 01:59 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
I've never understood why locals() returned a mutable dictionary
either, except that Python has no immutable dictionary type.
Ah, but these days it has types.MappingProxyType which provides a
read-only
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2012-09-28 - 2012-10-05)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open3770 (+16)
closed 24149 (+43)
total 27919 (+59)
Open issues wit
On 05/10/12 22:58, Nick Coghlan wrote about locals():
As for *why* changes don't get written back, it's because the compiler
is allowed to assume it knows about every variable name that exists in
the local scope (by design), and that doesn't fit with writable
locals() for functions.
And to be
On 10/05/2012 01:59 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
I've never understood why locals() returned a mutable dictionary
either, except that Python has no immutable dictionary type.
Ah, but these days it has types.MappingProxyType which provides a
read-only wrapper around another mapping type. Perhap
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> I find myself unable to choose between 2) and 4), which suggests that
>> the status quo wins and we keep the current behaviour.
>
> What is the benefit of having a dict that repres
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I find myself unable to choose between 2) and 4), which suggests that
> the status quo wins and we keep the current behaviour.
What is the benefit of having a dict that represents a namespace, but
whose mutations don't mutate said namespac
Thank you, Jesus. I've missed this function.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:03 AM, jesus.cea wrote:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e278f3ab0190
> changeset: 79484:e278f3ab0190
> user:Jesus Cea
> date:Fri Oct 05 04:02:41 2012 +0200
> summary:
> Issue #14446: Remove deprecated tk
Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to split the huge unicodeobject.c file into smaller
> files. It's just the longest C file of CPython: 14,849 lines.
>
> I don't know exactly how to split it, but first I would like to know
> if you would agree with the idea.
>
> Example:
> - Objects/
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Ben Leslie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a Python program where I have many threads each calling Popen, and
> I was hitting some trouble.
>
> I've been seeing this on 3.2.3, however I believe the same issue is still
> potentially a problem on head.
>
> The error mani
11 matches
Mail list logo
