On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Raymond Hettinger
wrote:
> I'll look at this in more detail after I've finishing my review of the
> TransformDict,
> but my initial impression is that the original show stopper hasn't been
> overcome:
> http://bugs.python.org/issue10977
>
> The concrete dict API is
On Oct 20, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
> If anyone is interested in having a (faithful) C implementation of
> OrderedDict for the 3.4 release, I have a patch up [1]. My interest
> in having the patch applied is relative to proposals that won't apply
> to 3.4, so I haven't felt the need t
On 10/20/2013 07:42 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
In short, I recommend that efforts be directed at improving help() rather than
limiting introspection by way of less clean coding practices.
+1
We also have the option of adding a custom __dir__ to change what help()
displays.
--
~Ethan~
___
Two of the new context managers in contextlib are now wrapped in pass-through
factory functions. The intent is to make the help() look cleaner. This
practice does have downsides however.
The usual way to detect whether something is usable with a with-statement is to
check the presence of th
On behalf of the Python development team, I'm very pleased to announce
the fourth and final alpha release of Python 3.4.
This is a preview release, and its use is not recommended for
production settings.
Python 3.4 includes a range of improvements of the 3.x series, including
hundreds of small
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 16:34:30 -0700, Hasan Diwan wrote:
> I've been using the logging module recently and noticed the default format
> doesn't timestamp log entries. I've not figured out how to change the
> format after initialization. This is python 2.7, on Mac OS X. Help, anyone?
This mailing li
I've been using the logging module recently and noticed the default format
doesn't timestamp log entries. I've not figured out how to change the
format after initialization. This is python 2.7, on Mac OS X. Help, anyone?
-- H
--
Sent from my mobile device
Envoyé de mon portable
__
2013/10/20 Ned Deily :
>
> On Oct 20, 2013, at 15:57 , Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>
>> 2013/10/20 Larry Hastings :
>>>
>>>
>>> 3.4.0a4 is tagged and I'm in the process of releasing it. But it's going to
>>> be, let's say, more "alpha-quality" than the previous alphas.
>>>
>>> Known problems:
>>>
>>
On Oct 20, 2013, at 15:57 , Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2013/10/20 Larry Hastings :
>>
>>
>> 3.4.0a4 is tagged and I'm in the process of releasing it. But it's going to
>> be, let's say, more "alpha-quality" than the previous alphas.
>>
>> Known problems:
>>
>> There's a reference count leak
2013/10/20 Larry Hastings :
>
>
> 3.4.0a4 is tagged and I'm in the process of releasing it. But it's going to
> be, let's say, more "alpha-quality" than the previous alphas.
>
> Known problems:
>
> There's a reference count leak in the compiler.
This is fixed, so you could just move the tag up a
3.4.0a4 is tagged and I'm in the process of releasing it. But it's
going to be, let's say, more "alpha-quality" than the previous alphas.
Known problems:
* There's a reference count leak in the compiler.
* asyncio test suite sometimes times out, which takes... an hour.
* asyncio test sui
How about if Brett and Nick both agree that it's good, I approve it?
If either one wants more discussion I'll appoint them the PEP-BDFL.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Eric Snow
> wrote:
>> Any comments? Usually silence implies no disapprov
If anyone is interested in having a (faithful) C implementation of
OrderedDict for the 3.4 release, I have a patch up [1]. My interest
in having the patch applied is relative to proposals that won't apply
to 3.4, so I haven't felt the need to advance the patch. However, in
case anyone else would
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Eric Snow wrote:
> Any comments? Usually silence implies no disapproval. ;) PEP 451 did
> go through several rounds of review on import-sig, so I'm not going to
> stress over low feedback at this point. However, I'd particularly
> appreciate knowing if there are
Or perhaps call it "contextlib.ignore_first(Exception)"?
Mark Favas
iVEC@CSIRO Director
A/Director, Technical Operations, iVEC
Advanced Scientific Computing
CSIRO IM&T
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/l
Favas, Mark (CSIRO IM&T, Kensington) would like to recall the message,
"cpython: Rename contextlib.ignored() to contextlib.ignore().".
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
htt
2013/10/19 Charles-François Natali :
>> get_object_trace(obj) is a shortcut for
>> get_trace(get_object_address(obj)). I agree that the wrong size
>> information can be surprising.
>>
>> I can delete get_object_trace(), or rename the function to
>> get_object_traceback() and modify it to only retur
I have posted the latest version of PEP 453 to python.org. It is
available in the usual place:
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0453/
Three significant changes have been made since the last posted version:
* removed the proposal to change the script installation directory on
Windows, due t
On 20 October 2013 16:08, Armin Rigo wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> recreating the *exact* exception subclass check from
>> Python is actually difficult these days.
>
> Can't it be done roughly like that?
>
>def __exit__(self, typ, val, tb):
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
