Quoting Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
If you don't want to do an rc3 despite the cherry picked changes since
rc2, then you need to make it easy for people to test the changes
directly from the release branch. An opaque intermittently updated
tarball is not acceptable when none of our
On 4 March 2014 20:16, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Quoting Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
If you don't want to do an rc3 despite the cherry picked changes since
rc2, then you need to make it easy for people to test the changes
directly from the release branch. An opaque intermittently
Hi,
2014-03-03 22:38 GMT+01:00 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
Related question - have you decided yet whether or not to do an rc3?
I take a look at current release blocker issues for Python 3.4. I saw
bugfixes (ex: upgrade SQLite from 3.8.3 to 3.8.3.1) but also fixes for
regressions between
Guido van Rossum writes:
Given that the claim Python 2 doesn't support Unicode filenames
is factually incorrect (in Python 2.7, most filesystem calls in
fact do support Unicode, at least on some platforms),
I don't understand what support Unicode means. Just that
with open(u\u4e00,
On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 11:16:41 +0100
mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Quoting Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
If you don't want to do an rc3 despite the cherry picked changes since
rc2, then you need to make it easy for people to test the changes
directly from the release branch. An opaque
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 11:16:41 +0100
mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Quoting Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
If you don't want to do an rc3 despite the cherry picked changes since
rc2, then you need to make it easy
Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com wrote:
I do have one question though. Suppose you encounter a compiler that
doesn't understand the inline keyword, so you choose the static
declaration as Kristján suggested. The resulting Python executable
should be functionally correct, but if the optimizer
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.orgwrote:
Guido van Rossum writes:
Given that the claim Python 2 doesn't support Unicode filenames
is factually incorrect (in Python 2.7, most filesystem calls in
fact do support Unicode, at least on some platforms),
Am 04.03.2014 15:52, schrieb Brett Cannon:
I have also filed http://bugs.python.org/issue20851 to make sure the
devguide covers running tests from a tarball. If the way the release has
been handled has still bugged you enough it can be discussed at the
language summit, but it would be the
On 5 Mar 2014 08:15, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Am 04.03.2014 15:52, schrieb Brett Cannon:
I have also filed http://bugs.python.org/issue20851 to make sure the
devguide covers running tests from a tarball. If the way the release has
been handled has still bugged you enough it
On Mar 05, 2014, at 09:24 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I think it's also the fact that new feature releases are rare and changes
of release manager even more so, meaning there's a fair bit of relearning
involved every time (since what was appropriate a couple of years earlier
may not be appropriate
On 03/04/2014 03:59 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I too would like an rc3, especially to see if issue 19021 can be fixed, which
I suspect will hit a lot of people.
I talked to the other guys on the 3.4 team, and we're all willing to do
an rc3 this weekend. I'll add that to PEP 429.
In other
12 matches
Mail list logo
