n 31.03.2014 21:09, Chris Barker wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Fred Drake f...@fdrake.net wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz
wrote:
ISO 8601 doesn't seem to define a representation for
negative durations, though, so it wouldn't solve the
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 7:52 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
print now() + RelativeDateTime(months=+1, day=1)
2014-05-01 14:49:05.83
I find this sort date arithmetic unintuitive, though I'm at a loss to
come up with better logic than you have:
d = Date(2014, 2, 28)
d +
On 2014-04-02, at 15:04 , Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 7:52 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
print now() + RelativeDateTime(months=+1, day=1)
2014-05-01 14:49:05.83
I find this sort date arithmetic unintuitive, though I'm at a loss to
come up with
On 02.04.2014 15:04, Skip Montanaro wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 7:52 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
print now() + RelativeDateTime(months=+1, day=1)
2014-05-01 14:49:05.83
I find this sort date arithmetic unintuitive, though I'm at a loss to
come up with better logic than you
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Regarding the warnings for this one - is there a way for the checker
to warn if data structures are exposed directly, rather than as opaque
types? It's fine if there isn't, it would just be cool if there was -
one of the premises of the stable ABI is that it *doesn't* expose
Am 01.04.14 13:45, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
Interesting to see the UCS2 removal there for 3.3. That's a genuine
removal from the public ABI as part of PEP 393. I guess the reason
nobody complained is because most 3.2 Linux builds used the UCS4 ABI
instead, and the stable ABI hadn't seen broad
Just to let those who read the list as a list (or via mail.python.org,
as I just did as a backup) know, news.gmane.org appears to have
stoppedreceiving new messages from mailing listsat about 0:30 this
morning (apr 2). (I am judging this from the last recorded post on the
super-busy linux
