Hi,
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 at 12:33 Ben Hoyt wrote:
> Others: if you want to benchmark this, the simplest way is to use my
> os.walk() benchmark.py test program here:
> https://github.com/benhoyt/scandir -- it compares the built-in os.walk()
> implemented with os.listdir() with a version of walk() i
2015-03-08 3:31 GMT+01:00 Ben Hoyt :
> Thanks for committing this, Victor! And fixing the d_type issue on funky
> platforms.
You're welcome.
> Note that the actual CPython version of os.walk() doesn't yet use
> os.scandir(). I intend to open a separate issue for that shortly (or Victor
> can). Bu
Thanks for committing this, Victor! And fixing the d_type issue on funky
platforms.
Others: if you want to benchmark this, the simplest way is to use my
os.walk() benchmark.py test program here: https://github.com/benhoyt/scandir
-- it compares the built-in os.walk() implemented with os.listdir()
Hi,
FYI I commited the implementation of os.scandir() written by Ben Hoyt.
I hope that it will be part of Python 3.5 alpha 2 (Ben just sent the
final patch today).
Please test this new feature. You may benchmark here.
http://bugs.python.org/issue22524 contains some benchmark tools and
benchmark r
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 12:39 PM Scott Dial
wrote:
> On 2015-03-06 11:34 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > This PEP proposes eliminating the concept of PYO files from Python.
> > To continue the support of the separation of bytecode files based on
> > their optimization level, this PEP proposes extendin
This describes an optimization for "binary insertion sort" (BINSORT for
short).
BINSORT has been implemented in Python, CyThon, and Timsort (the default
Array.sort() in JAVA SE 7 and JAVA SE 8)
I have read the BINSORT in Timsort
http://grepcode.com/file/repository.grepcode.com/java/root/jdk/openj
Hello,
The winreg module has a function for loading a registry key under
another registry key, called winreg.LoadKey. Unfortunately, the module
doesn't provide a way to unload that key after the user finishes
operating with it. There's a patch [1] for exporting the RegUnloadKey
[2] API in winreg
On 2015-03-06 11:34 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> This PEP proposes eliminating the concept of PYO files from Python.
> To continue the support of the separation of bytecode files based on
> their optimization level, this PEP proposes extending the PYC file
> name to include the optimization level in b
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 9:29 AM Ron Adam wrote:
>
>
> On 03/07/2015 04:58 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 08:00:20PM -0500, Ron Adam wrote:
> >
> >> >Have you considered doing this by having different magic numbers in the
> >> >.pyc file for standard, -O, and -O0 compiled by
On 03/07/2015 04:58 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 08:00:20PM -0500, Ron Adam wrote:
>Have you considered doing this by having different magic numbers in the
>.pyc file for standard, -O, and -O0 compiled bytecode files? Python
>already checks that number and recompiles th
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 08:00:20PM -0500, Ron Adam wrote:
> Have you considered doing this by having different magic numbers in the
> .pyc file for standard, -O, and -O0 compiled bytecode files? Python
> already checks that number and recompiles the files if it's not what it's
> expected to be
11 matches
Mail list logo
