On 14 Jun 2015 03:35, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
From a learnability perspective, there's also nothing about an
f_stack attribute that says you can use this to find out where a
generator or coroutine has
On 14 Jun 2015 10:01, Ben Leslie be...@benno.id.au wrote:
If this seems like a good approach I'll try and work it in to a
suitable patch for contribution.
I think it's a good approach, and worth opening an enhancement issue for.
I expect any patch would need some adjustments after Yury has
Nick Coghlan wrote:
I wonder if in 3.6 it might be possible to *add* some bookkeeping to
await and yield from expressions that provides external visibility
into the underlying iterable or coroutine that the generator-iterator
or coroutine has delegated flow control to.
In my original
On 14 June 2015 at 09:20, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
I wonder if in 3.6 it might be possible to *add* some bookkeeping to
await and yield from expressions that provides external visibility
into the underlying iterable or coroutine that the
On 13 June 2015 at 19:03, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 June 2015 at 04:13, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
IOW I don't think that the problem here is that you haven't sufficiently
motivated
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 June 2015 at 04:13, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
IOW I don't think that the problem here is that you haven't sufficiently
motivated your use case -- you are asking for information that just isn't
On 13 June 2015 at 17:22, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 June 2015 at 04:13, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
IOW I don't think that the problem here is that you haven't sufficiently
motivated your use case -- you are asking for information that just isn't
available.
Hi ,
I had a Question,i hope i'll find the solution here.
Say i have a Queue.
h = Queue.Queue(maxsize=0)
h.put(1)
h.put(2)
h.empty()
False
h.join()
h.empty()
False
h.get()
1
h.get()
2
h.get()
Blocked...
My Question is :
In a single threaded environment why does
On 13 June 2015 at 04:13, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
IOW I don't think that the problem here is that you haven't sufficiently
motivated your use case -- you are asking for information that just isn't
available. (Which is actually where you started the thread -- you can get to
the
On 13 June 2015 at 20:25, Ben Leslie be...@benno.id.au wrote:
Is there any reason an f_stack attribute is not exposed for frames? Many of
the
other PyFrameObject values are exposed. I'm guessing that there probably
aren't too many places where you can get hold of a frame that doesn't have an
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 June 2015 at 20:25, Ben Leslie be...@benno.id.au wrote:
Is there any reason an f_stack attribute is not exposed for frames? Many
of the
other PyFrameObject values are exposed. I'm guessing that there probably
On 2015-06-13 11:38, jaivish kothari wrote:
Hi ,
I had a Question,i hope i'll find the solution here.
Say i have a Queue.
h = Queue.Queue(maxsize=0)
h.put(1)
h.put(2)
h.empty()
False
h.join()
h.empty()
False
h.get()
1
h.get()
2
h.get()
Blocked...
My
12 matches
Mail list logo
