Re: [Python-Dev] Profile Guided Optimization active by-default

2015-08-24 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 25 August 2015 at 05:52, Gregory P. Smith wrote: > What we tested and decided to use on our own builds after benchmarking at > work was to build with: > > make profile-opt PROFILE_TASK="-m test.regrtest -w -uall,-audio -x test_gdb > test_multiprocessing" > > In general if a test is unreliable o

Re: [Python-Dev] Profile Guided Optimization active by-default

2015-08-24 Thread Stewart, David C
(Sorry about the format here - I honestly just subscribed to Python-dev so be gentle ...) > Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 11:25:59 -0600 > From: Eric Snow >On Aug 22, 2015 9:02 AM, "Patrascu, Alecsandru" intel.com > >wrote:[snip]> For instance, as sh

Re: [Python-Dev] Profile Guided Optimization active by-default

2015-08-24 Thread Matthias Klose
The current pgo target just uses a very specific task to train for the feedback. For my Debian/Ubuntu builds I'm using the testsuite minus some problematic tests to train. Otoh I don't know if this is the best way to do it, however it gave better results at some time in the past. What I would like

Re: [Python-Dev] How are we merging forward from the Bitbucket 3.5 repo?

2015-08-24 Thread Larry Hastings
On 08/16/2015 08:24 AM, R. David Murray wrote: On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 00:13:10 -0700, Larry Hastings wrote: Can we pick one approach and stick with it? Pretty-please? Pick one Larry, you are the RM :) Okay. Unsurprisingly, I pick what I called option 3 before. It's basically what we do now

Re: [Python-Dev] Profile Guided Optimization active by-default

2015-08-24 Thread Gregory P. Smith
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 9:27 AM Brett Cannon wrote: > On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, 09:17 Guido van Rossum wrote: > > How about we first add a new Makefile target that enables PGO, without > turning it on by default? Then later we can enable it by default. > > There already is one and has been for many

Re: [Python-Dev] tp_finalize vs tp_del sematics

2015-08-24 Thread Valentine Sinitsyn
Hi Armin, Thanks for replying. On 23.08.2015 17:14, Armin Rigo wrote: Hi Valentine, On 19 August 2015 at 09:53, Valentine Sinitsyn wrote: why it wasn't possible to implement proposed CI disposal scheme on top of tp_del? I'm replying here as best as I understand the situation, which might b