What am I doing wrong?
I have tried:
hg update 3.5 # and hg update default
make distclean && ./configure --with-pydebug && make -j2
cd Doc
make doctest
and in both cases I get page
On 11/13/2015 04:12 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> What am I doing wrong?
Running "make doctest" in the first place. The doctests in the core docs
were not written to support that, and also never updated to do so.
Georg
> I have tried:
>
>
> h
We don't have clean doctests for the docs. Patches welcome.
At one point I had made the turtle doctests pass (it draws a bunch of
stuff on the screen) because otherwise we don't have very many turtle
tests, but I haven't checked it in a couple years.
Hmm. We could list making the doc doctests p
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> What am I doing wrong?
Expecting it to work :)
`make doctest` is a Sphinx feature, not specific to our docs. Ideally
someday it should work (and I'll add it to the Docs buildbot), but
nobody has tried to make it work yet. Making it work mi
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2015-11-06 - 2015-11-13)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open5232 (+14)
closed 32143 (+35)
total 37375 (+49)
Open issues wit
On 11/13/2015 07:12 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> What am I doing wrong?
On 11/13/2015 07:40 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> Running "make doctest" in the first place. The doctests in the core
> docs were not written to support that, and also never updated to do
> so.
On 11/13/2015 07:42 AM, Zachary Ware
When I try to press 'retry' on http://bugs.python.org/review/25074/
page and send a message server responds with 500 error.
Going through the page for viewing diff for concrete file
http://bugs.python.org/review/25074/diff/15535/Lib/test/test_asyncio/test_base_events.py
with adding a comment works
Hi python-dev,
We have a Python script that runs correctly under Python 2.6, 2.7 and 3.3+.
It is executed on a *nix system using the "python" executable (ie not
python2 or python3 specifically). This works just fine for systems that
have Python 2 installed, or 2 and 3, or just 3 and symlink "pytho
On Nov 13, 2015, at 10:32 PM, Damien George wrote:
>1. What is the true intent of PEP 394 when only Python 3 is installed? Is
>"python" available or not to run scripts compatible with 2.x and 3.x?
>
>2. Is it possible to write a shebang line that supports all variations of
>Python installations o
