Hi all,
While I appreciate the vote of confidence from everyone, I'm not interested
in being the BDFL-delegate for this. I don't think it's a good idea, and
I'm not willing to put further time into.
If he's interested, Donald Stufft would make a good choice for delegate.
Really do appreciate
On 2015-11-17 01:00, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Hm, making Christian the BDFL-delegate would mean two out of three
> authors *and* the BDFL-delegate all working for Red Hat, which clearly
> has a stake (and IIUC has already committed to this approach ahead of
> PEP approval). SO then it would look
2015-11-23 7:21 GMT+01:00 Alexander Walters :
> collections.Counter.__add__ as a bit of a quirk.
>
> Counters allow for negative numbers. You can subtract from a counter into
> the negative no problem. However, if you have a counter with a negative
> value and add it to
On 24 November 2015 at 11:59, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>>Since we already know Red Hat are OK with the draft recommendations,
>>and I missed the RHEL 7.2 release date anyway, perhaps Barry or
>>Matthias might be interested in
> On Nov 23, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Vlastimil Brom wrote:
>
>> Is there any particular reason counters drop negative values when you add
>> them together? I definitely expected them to act like ints do when you add
>> negatives, and had to subclass it to get what I think
On 24 November 2015 at 06:47, Wes Turner wrote:
> 1. Does this affect easy_install?
easy_install has validated certificates since distribute was merged
back into the project as part of setuptools 0.7 [1], and aside from
one issue with HTTPS tunnelling [2], the certificate
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 24 November 2015 at 06:47, Wes Turner wrote:
> > 1. Does this affect easy_install?
>
> easy_install has validated certificates since distribute was merged
> back into the project as part of
Updated version of the PEP posted: https://hg.python.org/peps/rev/8decac213ebf
On 24 November 2015 at 05:35, Christian Heimes wrote:
> 1) The example implementation of the function doesn't check the
> sys.flags.ignore_environment. Internally CPython has specialized getenv
>
On 24 November 2015 at 05:35, Christian Heimes wrote:
> On 2015-11-17 01:00, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> Hm, making Christian the BDFL-delegate would mean two out of three
>> authors *and* the BDFL-delegate all working for Red Hat, which clearly
>> has a stake (and IIUC has
On 24 November 2015 at 12:05, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Nov 17, 2015, at 11:44 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>>For Debian, Ubuntu and SUSE, their original determinations for the
>>relevant CVE were "too intrusive to backport", so folks currently need
>>to upgrade to newer versions of
On Nov 24, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>Since we already know Red Hat are OK with the draft recommendations,
>and I missed the RHEL 7.2 release date anyway, perhaps Barry or
>Matthias might be interested in tilting at the Ubuntu 14.04 LTS stable
>release update windmill? I know there
On Nov 17, 2015, at 11:44 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>For Debian, Ubuntu and SUSE, their original determinations for the
>relevant CVE were "too intrusive to backport", so folks currently need
>to upgrade to newer versions of those distros to get the improved
>default behaviour:
This is an example
... Just had this discussion in regards to easy_install, Ubuntu 14.04 LTS,
and the ReadTheDocs Docker images (as well as: ~why should I have to
wget/curl get-pip.py)
https://github.com/rtfd/readthedocs-docker-images/pull/3
On Nov 23, 2015 2:47 PM, "Wes Turner" wrote:
> 1.
1. Does this affect easy_install?
2. If/because this affects easy_install,
should the guidance / suggested package installation tool be [pip];
because pip install_requires backports.ssl_match_hostname
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/backports.ssl_match_hostname
On Nov 10, 2015 6:48 PM, "Nick
14 matches
Mail list logo